If they can make up nukes in Iraq, changing DU content in a plane is kids stuff.
I have seen that man selling fish and chips stands as biological weapon labs
to the UN.
hehe
LOL
But,
a) they didn't make that up (no one ever said Saddam *had* nukes,
the claim was that he was trying to get them, and getting closer)
b) he did have such a program, as was verified by inspectors after
the first Gulf War
c) if we assume a recent conspiracy, or to the extent recent claims
were overwrought, any coverup wasn't very successful, was it?
So when you say "If they can make up nukes in Iraq..." I'd reply
"They couldn't!"
Any use of DU in planes--built and worked on over decades (and
several presidents) by countless civilian contractors with no security
clearances, and under full supervision of several political
administrations (the government has physical custody of the material,
oversees, licenses and distributes it)--would seem a lot harder to
keep secret than a few classified reports from spies about the most
secret aspirations of a closed society. And they couldn't keep the
latter secret, could they?
Also, as I pointed out before, radiation is extremely easy to
detect--anyone with a geiger counter can detect the smallest amounts--
so hard scientific data on the crash sites would be impossible to
hide, if they were actually "hot." One website you quoted reported
elevated readings, but only a few times more than background, nothing
extraordinary. And are readings still elevated, either at the
Pentagon or in New York I'm sure we'd know if they were. So how does
one explain that if there was DU on site? Has that alleged material
experienced a magically accelerated decay rate? It doesn't fit.
So, believe what you wish, but I'd believe Boeing, their many
employees and contractors, and the several controlling civilian
government agencies over the past few decades--hundreds and hundreds
of civilians in total--when they say there's no DU on 757s or
767s.
With warm regards,
James Arthur