So you consider these as potentially as lethal and easy to conceal as a
hand gun?
Woah another goalpost shifter!
" Why should a so called sport involve a device invented for killing or
maiming?"
Was the question I answered. Now you're off about something else. The
fact is that many sports involve the use of device invented for killing
or maiming. Does that make them any less of a sport or mean that the
practice or development of that sport should be stopped?
And most of these started out as hunting weapons. Not so the
hand gun. Its sole purpose is to kill or main man.
Nope, you're repeating that as a mantra and you're wrong like all the
others were.
So be it then. Let the 'sport' die. It's of no value anyway.
Of course, and lets stop all the other sports involving weapons, they're
of no value anyway.
I'm sure a dingy is capable of killing someone but not usually on the
streets of London.
We're talking about sport, if one can be simulated so can others. That
doesn't mean it's sensible to do so.
They are modified to prevent serious harm. Are the handguns used in
competition?
They are controlled to prevent any harm, that's good enough for me.
It may well do. But the problem is the possession of the handgun(s).
Why is it a problem? Can you name a target shooter who has killed
anyone?
