Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Re: UK RICS report says solar takes 208 years to repay...nonsense! Help needed!

S

Steve Firth

Eeyore said:
It was done as a result of public pressure as I'm sure you well know.

It was carefully manipulated by government and press as I'm sure you are
aware. After Hungerford a police marksman I know formed part of a
deputation to beg Geoffrey Howe to reconsider the ban that was bound to
follow. Howe told him that the legislation had been drafted years ago,
and that all they had done was to wait for an appropriate moment to
bring it before Parliament.
 
S

Steve Firth

Eeyore said:
When exactly did they renounce all use of violence ? And 'putting weapons
out of reach' ?

Do you want to put those goalposts back where you found them?

The IRA announced a ceasefire on 31 August 1994 with "a complete
cessation of military operations."

The Stormont elections were on 25 June 1998.
 
S

Steve Firth

Eeyore said:

Don't tell me what I mean. The government has had an opportunity to
rethink the legislation in the run up to the 2012 Olympics. It has
declined to offer the option to resume target pistol shooting in the UK.
And I said I disagree with that.

But you support the legislation that bans sport use of pistols.
You're *REALLY* determined not to listen to what I'm TELLING you. ! I have
always thought the restrictions on sport shooting were excessive, from the
day I first heard about it. It smacked of someone in power having it in
for the sport (a bit like fox hunting perhaps). Since it was under Nu
Labour, I imagine they deemed sport shooting to be 'politically
incorrect'. Heck, even I have shot on a range. Untwist those damn knickers
of yours !

Umm hmm, as long as you support a ban, you support a ban on the sport.
 
M

Morris Dovey

Eeyore wrote:
| Morris Dovey wrote:

|| many times more non-firearm murders than that every year. Nearly of
|| the murders are either arise from domestic disputes or are
|| drug-related. I don't have exact statistics, but read the all too
|| frequent reports in the newspapers.
|
| I'm sure and in a 'domestic' I dare say it's easy to use that
| firearm in a 'moment of madness'. NO firearm, probably no murder.

That's probably not the case. More probably, given the level of rage
required to take a spouse's life, the alternative would be a knife or
blunt object.

|| It might help to remember that Americans aren't simply Brits who've
|| forgotten how to spell. You and I see the world through different
|| eyes, and although we can carry on a conversation and agree about
|| nearly everything that a pair of Brits or a pair of Americans might
|| agree on, our ability to survive and thrive in our personal worlds
|| depends on our abilities to automatically react to events in
|| different contexts.
|
| Oh yes, I've been increasingly aware of the differences, largely
| through conversations such as this one on usenet in fact.

Thank you for making the effort. Understanding is always worthwhile,
but often difficult to come by - for Americans, too - perhaps even
more difficult for many of us because of our geographical separation
from so many of the other important cultures in our world...

|| However difficult it might be for you to appreciate, the American
|| fixation on lethal defense (and you're mistaken if you believe it's
|| limited to firearms) has a solid basis in the American context. It
|| doesn't matter that anyone might find that irrational or
|| uncivilized - it's real. To reach back and borrow from British
|| naval tradition: We're prepared to repel all boarders. That there
|| may (note the implied uncertainty) no longer be a need such
|| defense is moot - the preparedness has become part of our fiber.
|
| I've always also kind of imagined it dates back to 'frontier
| spirit' and fending off wild animals, injuns and so on. It just
| seems sad it's not possible to move in.

Don't forget that along with some hostile residents and some wild
animals, there were unfriendly foreign armies.

I'd like to agree and disagree at the same time, so I won't do either.
I'm an American and that's how I am. It's my nature to want everyone
to be my friend, and to be a good friend to all people. I hope for the
best - and I prepare for the worst. <shrug>

| I'm additionally forever perplexed that Americans seem keen to
| encourage wider ownership of guns in other countries in this
| bizarre belief that we'll be somehow 'safer' in spite of what all
| the evidence says.

Hmm. This particular American hasn't done so. I've pretty much figured
that it wasn't any of my business. I wouldn't even have discussed it
with you except that you seemed so intent on establishing some weird
kind of moral superiority based on non-possession of firearms.

| The US gun death rate is FORTY times that in the UK btw.

Have you considered that Americans might already have recognized that
we're paying a very high price for our right to have firearms, and
that a clear majority have chosen to pay that price? I'd like to
suggest that your inability to understand that choice does not
necessarily mean that the majority of Americans are either stupid or
foolish.

You might ponder why so many Americans would choose to pay such a high
price.

One fortieth the US rate sounds OK.
Zero would be better.
 
A

Andy Hall

What was then Palestine was under British administration. It's not the
same/comparable at all.

Graham

The details don't really matter. The point is of a group trying to
disrupt the status quo.
 
E

Eeyore

Steve said:
No knives in the kitchen drawer in places where you live?

Most knives at home are too blunt to do much damage.

Also, using a knife to kill requires very deliberate and serious physical
effort, close up. A gun can kill at a distance with minimal effort.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Steve said:
The Vermon murder rate (1.5/100,000) is exactly the same as in the UK.
Yet in Vermont citizens don't even need a permit to carry a concealed
weapon.

For violent crime the figures are truly shocking.

UK - 2300 per 100,000
Vermont - 119.7 per 100,000

Violent crime reporting methods vary wildly. I wouldn't be at all surprised
under Nu Labour if a mere argument at home counts as violent crime if the police
get called out.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Steve said:
It was carefully manipulated by government and press as I'm sure you are
aware. After Hungerford a police marksman I know formed part of a
deputation to beg Geoffrey Howe to reconsider the ban that was bound to
follow. Howe told him that the legislation had been drafted years ago,
and that all they had done was to wait for an appropriate moment to
bring it before Parliament.

We're not talking about Hungerford but Dunblane.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Morris said:
Eeyore wrote:
| Morris Dovey wrote:

|| many times more non-firearm murders than that every year. Nearly of
|| the murders are either arise from domestic disputes or are
|| drug-related. I don't have exact statistics, but read the all too
|| frequent reports in the newspapers.
|
| I'm sure and in a 'domestic' I dare say it's easy to use that
| firearm in a 'moment of madness'. NO firearm, probably no murder.

That's probably not the case. More probably, given the level of rage
required to take a spouse's life, the alternative would be a knife or
blunt object.

A gun is far easier to kill with than a knife *and* is more remote, making it
easier (less involving). I believe the issue has been studied in some depth but
I don't have a cite handy.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Steve said:
The Vermon murder rate (1.5/100,000) is exactly the same as in the UK.
Yet in Vermont citizens don't even need a permit to carry a concealed
weapon.

For violent crime the figures are truly shocking.

UK - 2300 per 100,000
Vermont - 119.7 per 100,000

I believe the reporting criteria for 'violent crime' are hugely different
between the 2 counties. In the UK 'violent crime' no longer even has to involve
actual violence, merely the threat or suggestion of it.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Steve said:
The Vermon murder rate (1.5/100,000) is exactly the same as in the UK.
Yet in Vermont citizens don't even need a permit to carry a concealed
weapon.

Vermont is highly atypical of the USA. No large down at heel cities with an
underclass, a significant wealthy and well-educated population, it's without
much poverty overall AIUI and is quite 'liberal' by US standards.

Now try Chicago/Illinois.

Graham
 
S

Steve Firth

Eeyore said:
Most knives at home are too blunt to do much damage.

Also, using a knife to kill requires very deliberate and serious physical
effort,

Umm no it's quite easy actually, very little physical effort.
close up. A gun can kill at a distance with minimal effort.

Uh huh, and it's difficult to kill someone using a candle. Sorry what
was your point here?
 
S

Steve Firth

Eeyore said:
We're not talking about Hungerford but Dunblane.

Neat sidestep. Are you alleging that the press and politicians changed
their tactics in between the two?
 
S

Steve Firth

Eeyore said:
Vermont is highly atypical of the USA. No large down at heel cities with an
underclass, a significant wealthy and well-educated population, it's without
much poverty overall AIUI and is quite 'liberal' by US standards.

Uh huh, so a very good match for the UK then.
Now try Chicago/Illinois.

The concealed carry laws are different, there's no point. Much like your
argument.
 
S

Steve Firth

Morris Dovey said:
One fortieth the US rate sounds OK.
Zero would be better.

It would sound good if it were a real statistic. The truth is more
complicated, as ever.
 
O

Owain

Steve said:
Ah yes, well there were are onto a different tack and the answer to that
is mostly "it depends". I've lived in countries where guns are permitted
and those where they are banned. The USA appears to be a real exceptiion
in terms of culture. People blast away at each other there without
thinkign much about what they are up to and also they tend to be fairly
careless.

Compare to Canada, where gun ownership is, I think, higher than in the
US because of more widespread hunting.

Owain
 
A

Andy Hall

Violent crime reporting methods vary wildly. I wouldn't be at all surprised
under Nu Labour if a mere argument at home counts as violent crime if
the police
get called out.

Graham

No, you're confusing it with Prime Minister's question time.........
 
Top