K
keith
Well, it's rather large. What's that have to do with "Lefties can't
afford lunch"? Oh? Do you mean the percentage restrictions?
No. You're buying! (why do they need to be able to "afford" anything)
Well, it's rather large. What's that have to do with "Lefties can't
afford lunch"? Oh? Do you mean the percentage restrictions?
No. You're buying! (why do they need to be able to "afford" anything)
Only if they randomly kill civilians for the explicit purpose of
terrorizing them. That isn't the same as, say, funding an insurgency
or encouraging a Bay of Pigs type thing.
Neoconservatives have a rational, and rather humanist, argument for
their politics, and it arguably makes sense... at least as much sense
as any liberal philosophy I've heard of.
Jim Thompson said:I'm happy as a clam! I bought myself a clam, a Crocea Clam, for my
reef tank ;-) Fascinating creature!
Rich Greiss says...
It seems your filter is leaky. You've been answering my
posts, dummy.
BTW: It is "neocon" not "Neoconservative" . These folks are not
conservatives. They do most of the things that they claim are the sins of
the liberals.
I don't believe I said anything about "this thread".Keith Williams wrote...
Not in this thread. He was answering my post.
"Neoconservative" has been defined as "a liberal who has been mugged
by reality." Many are in fact former liberals. The concept is, I
think, that the goals of liberalism are approximately correct, but the
methods don't work.
I'm trying to remember now... I believe Win bought _at_least_ one
round.
Good lefties aren't poor... they just like to imply that they're the
savior of the poor... but watch what Teddy DOESN'T do for Maynard High
School ;-)
It seems your filter is leaky. You've been answering my posts,
dummy.
The other 'keith', the one who has no last name and doesn't capitalize
his first name.
Dummy. ;-)
Plug the holes in your killfile, dummy.
Yup, if people disagree with you, kill them. That's what he's
advocating.
I'm trying to remember now... I believe Win bought _at_least_
one round.
John Larkin wrote...
Dear John, I know you have a strong right-wing streak, but please
don't be daft. While you (falsely) claim that we to the left of
George Bush have no sense of humor, you display that yourself, in
spades. Hell, Uncle Al even cracks a smile as he delivers his
critical line. I laughed myself silly. What does it take for you
to realize it's a joke? A pratfall?
On 26 Oct 2005 19:20:29 -0700, Winfield Hill
[snip]Hell, Uncle Al even cracks a smile as he delivers his
critical line. I laughed myself silly. What does it take for you
to realize it's a joke? A pratfall?
Daft? Just compare Molly Ivins to Anne Coulter.
Do you really find it funny to kick people in the groin, then hit them
with chairs and bottles? I suppose the Hillside Strangler may have
smiled as he choked young ladies.
It's sad that Al has run so dry of ideas that he has to imitate bad
Eric Siegel movies.
And speaking of that, why do oldish liberals seem to run to fat?
John
Keith Williams wrote...
Why don't you take a hike instead of calling everyone names?
On 26 Oct 2005 19:20:29 -0700, Winfield Hill
[snip]Hell, Uncle Al even cracks a smile as he delivers his
critical line. I laughed myself silly. What does it take for you
to realize it's a joke? A pratfall?
Daft? Just compare Molly Ivins to Anne Coulter.
Do you really find it funny to kick people in the groin, then hit them
with chairs and bottles? I suppose the Hillside Strangler may have
smiled as he choked young ladies.
It's sad that Al has run so dry of ideas that he has to imitate bad
Eric Siegel movies.
And speaking of that, why do oldish liberals seem to run to fat?
John
I find Molly Ivins funny... in fact I find all leftist weenies
funny... it's just hilarious how they "think".
I'm listening to "Uncle Al" on Air America right this minute...
nothing quite like a hollow-head to create a chuckle.
Jim Thompson wrote...
I'm pretty sure I bought more rounds than you. At least as many.
"Neoconservative" has been defined as "a liberal who has been mugged
by reality." Many are in fact former liberals. The concept is, I
think, that the goals of liberalism are approximately correct, but the
methods don't work.