Op Amp Calculations

[keith]

keith wrote...

http://wm.amazon.usa.speedera.net/wm.amazon.usa/books/AMAZON_V6_crop_100k.wmv

Another right-wing lie. It's clear in the skit Franken
feigned kicking the shin, just above the ankle. No groin
attack that. And you're wrong about "no longer funny,"
most of the old classic routines crop up in one form or
another in the comedy world all the time, usually to good
effect, and are revered and appreciated even if not funny.

A lie? Kicks to the groin are funny, Win? It is a lie when I say that
something isn't funny. You really need to calm down there boy.

What stiffs most of you right-wingers are, with little
sense of humor, unless it's a left-winger being whacked,
then it's funny as all get out! Whacking left-wingers is
a favorite sport of the right-wing crowd. If someone to
the left of Bush brings up some substantive critical point
about his governing, for example, instead of seeing the
issue discussed, we see the person viciously attacked.

No, Win, our sense of humor is a just a little more refined than Al
Franken's Three Stooges reprise. No, even whacking Allan Colmbs in the
knee isn't funny. Now Teddy Kennedy falling down drunk, that's funny
unless he's driving his girl friend home.

 

[John Larkin]

keith wrote...

http://wm.amazon.usa.speedera.net/wm.amazon.usa/books/AMAZON_V6_crop_100k.wmv

Another right-wing lie. It's clear in the skit Franken
feigned kicking the shin, just above the ankle. No groin
attack that. And you're wrong about "no longer funny,"
most of the old classic routines crop up in one form or
another in the comedy world all the time, usually to good
effect, and are revered and appreciated even if not funny.

What stiffs most of you right-wingers are, with little
sense of humor, unless it's a left-winger being whacked,
then it's funny as all get out! Whacking left-wingers is
a favorite sport of the right-wing crowd. If someone to
the left of Bush brings up some substantive critical point
about his governing, for example, instead of seeing the
issue discussed, we see the person viciously attacked.

Win,

either you think that freedom of speech, equality under law, and
common civility are for everybody,

or

you think that your team is right, the other guys are wrong, and
anything bad you can do to them is OK.



Which?

John

 

[Ken Smith]

A more important reason people become conservative with age is that
they know they are going to die, and they want their children to
survive and prosper.

That only works if you assume that the person was a conservative to start
with. A liberal will become more liberal for the same reason. Each side
believes that they know what is best for the future of their children.

Even the "neocons" seem to become more "neoconish" as they age. In their
case, I think it because they know that they will die soon and don't
really give the hind most 25% of a rat what happens after that. I'm sure
some of them think we are in the "last days" and that any money left over
will simply be wasted.

 

[Winfield Hill]

John Larkin wrote...

Win,

either you think that freedom of speech, equality under law, and
common civility are for everybody,

or

you think that your team is right, the other guys are wrong, and
anything bad you can do to them is OK.



Which?

The first, of course.

 

[Winfield Hill]

keith wrote...

A lie? Kicks to the groin are funny, Win? It is a lie when I say
that something isn't funny. You really need to calm down there boy.

Look at the wmv file, please, and see that it's clearly no more
than 1 foot off the floor, then STOP all your self-righteous
pontification. There simply were no "kicks to the groin."

You may not have intended a lie, but your FACTS were wrong, so
it was a mean vicious lie, against the critics of George Bush.
I've noticed you far right-wing types aren't so careful with
your facts when you go into attack mode.

 

[Winfield Hill]

keith wrote...

...are a real trip, Win! You *really* don't see your hypocrisy?

Yep, more name-calling, that's your avocation.

 

[Rich, Under the Affluence]

keith wrote...

Yep, more name-calling, that's your avocation.

I believe Mr. Hill probably sees all of his hypocrisy, to whatever
degree he has it, quite clearly, as do I. I see my own level of
hyprocisy - gawd, what a weird word! - and I see yours and that
of the rest of your reich-wing ilk, and I compare.

You guys win hands down.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Rich, Under the Affluence]

keith wrote...

[the usual keith hate fluff]

Look at the wmv file, please, and see that it's clearly no more
than 1 foot off the floor, then STOP all your self-righteous
pontification. There simply were no "kicks to the groin."

'keith' seems to be one of the ones who can't bring himself to
say "crotch" or "balls". Another symptom of self-righteous blue-
nosery.

And I've got him filtered, even his "professional" persona, since
he bitched about _not_ being filtered, but Win, you don't _have_
to keep feeding his trolling - you can't win an argument with a
zealot - all you can do is drag yourself down to their level and
grunt.
</friendly 'I'm oh so much wiser than you are' advice>

Cheers!
Rich

 

[keith]

keith wrote...

Yep, more name-calling, that's your avocation.

Win, you name call with the best of 'em. I only wish I could come up to
your name-calling standards. Sheesh, to think you can't even see yourself
in the mirror!

 

[keith]

I believe Mr. Hill probably sees all of his hypocrisy, to whatever
degree he has it, quite clearly, as do I. I see my own level of
hyprocisy - gawd, what a weird word! - and I see yours and that
of the rest of your reich-wing ilk, and I compare.

"Yours"? You drunk dum-****, you're responding to Win!

You guys win hands down.

Even when toasted, I have more brains in my dingernail dirt than someone
like you who can't even keep a job! ...and rely on the likes of the Wins
of the world to throw you a bone once in a while.

Of course you won't read this, because you're not man enough (or
perpetually stoned) to stand up for yourself.

 

[keith]

keith wrote...

Look at the wmv file, please, and see that it's clearly no more
than 1 foot off the floor, then STOP all your self-righteous
pontification. There simply were no "kicks to the groin."

Win, *I* did not say he kicked anyone in the groin. I said such humor
(groin/shin ~ no difference) is *NOT* funny. Please do try to be honest,
though I know it's a stretch.

You may not have intended a lie, but your FACTS were wrong, so it was a
mean vicious lie, against the critics of George Bush. I've noticed you
far right-wing types aren't so careful with your facts when you go into
attack mode.

*I* did not lie (I don't watch that moron). Do you really think there is
a huge difference between a kick in the groin and one to the shins?
Neither are funny, but I didn't say one way or the other.

Do look in a mirror Win and get your facts straight! Sheesh, I hope your
books are more accurate! ...and do chill! I'd not like to be the cause
of your mental-hernia.

 

[keith]

keith wrote...

[the usual keith hate fluff]

Look at the wmv file, please, and see that it's clearly no more
than 1 foot off the floor, then STOP all your self-righteous
pontification. There simply were no "kicks to the groin."

'keith' seems to be one of the ones who can't bring himself to
say "crotch" or "balls". Another symptom of self-righteous blue-
nosery.

"Blue-nosery", naw, that's Win. I'm a "red-nosery", stuck in the blueist
of nosery states.

And I've got him filtered, even his "professional" persona, since
he bitched about _not_ being filtered, but Win, you don't _have_
to keep feeding his trolling - you can't win an argument with a
zealot - all you can do is drag yourself down to their level and
grunt.

That's it. Hide and let mommy Win protect you behind her skirts. What a
loser!

</friendly 'I'm oh so much wiser than you are' advice>

Nit-wit (drug induced and otherwise).