E
Eeyore
Michael A. Terrell said:Any ass can throw together a design for audio equipment and sell it,
Simply untrue, the market is VERY competitive.
Graham
Michael A. Terrell said:Any ass can throw together a design for audio equipment and sell it,
Michael A. Terrell said:Try writing AGC code for a multiple telemetry system.
Jamie said:Cough, Cough.................................
Jesus Christ...
Who the hell would want your reverb code.
Michael A. Terrell said:Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.
Michael A. Terrell said:Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.
Eeyore said:john jardine wrote: [...]Servo arrangement summat like this?.
http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eloadte9.png
[An 'electronic load' project (scrapped). Occasionally blew opamps
consequent to particular dynamics on the Red wire. Traced to Drain/gate
feedback transients coupled with slightly dissimilar current source slew
rates.]
Surely would have been fixable with a reverse biased diode from op-amp o/p to V+
and another one from the - i/p to ground, but you'd have needed a small series
R.
Graham
Eeyore said:john jardine wrote: [...]Servo arrangement summat like this?.
http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eloadte9.png
[An 'electronic load' project (scrapped). Occasionally blew opamps
consequent to particular dynamics on the Red wire. Traced to Drain/gate
feedback transients coupled with slightly dissimilar current source slew
rates.]
Surely would have been fixable with a reverse biased diode from op-amp o/p to V+
and another one from the - i/p to ground, but you'd have needed a small series
R.
Yes. Fitted. The diodes only helped. Fast 30~40V, (external) incoming
edges through the Cgd's caused lock-up of one section, quickly
noticed by the others, nett result a few uS of chaotic transient
oscillations (and Cgd pumping) as they all settled into step. A few nH
of series strays didn't help either. A LF 'dominant pole' fixed the
problem but the setup was numb out beyond a few kc hence useless as a
'load'. Did the job at the time but would rethink next time round.
Michael A. Terrell said:There are no 'good ones'. The whole concept stinks.
Michael A. Terrell said:Your personal opinion in this matter is irrelevant, like in most
things you post. Reveb sucks. Period. It was done to death, along
with Echo effects and other novelty garbage 40+ years ago. Its just
another annoying form of distortion.
Michael A. Terrell said:There are no 'good ones'. The whole concept stinks.
Jamie said:Well good, does that mean we'll see a lot less of your vile here?
Jamie said:I'm glad you have graduated out of the spring technology..
What is it now? 8 Track Endless loops?
Well good, does that mean we'll see a lot less of your vile here?Eeyore said:Jamie wrote:
And how much DSP reverb code have you written ?
http://www.studiomaster.com/products/162bpx.htm
http://www.studiomaster.com/products/C3&C3X.htm
http://www.studiomaster.com/products/VMS.htm
http://www.studiomaster.com/reviews/c3x-0205a.pdf
http://www.studiomaster.com/reviews/c3x-0205b.pdf
http://www.studiomaster.com/reviews/c3x-0505.pdf
The MD of the company I used to consult for who's now desperate to have me
back. However I've also pretty much committed to another project last Monday.
Graham
Jamie said:What is it now? 8 Track Endless loops?
I'm glad you have graduated out of the spring technology..Eeyore said::
The whole audio industry disagrees with you. I doubt you've even heard a
good modern reverb or ADT. It's not springs any more you know.
Graham
Never progressed beyond Silicon diodes.Was this even with schottkies ?
Graham
Eeyore said:Jamie wrote:
Don't be stupid.
How much DSP code have YOU written ? I can tell you, when I took it on I
though it would be a challenge. Not writing the code per se, that's easy
enough but making it sound so right that reviewers glow over it.
Graham
Jamie said:LOL, I can tell you that you have a hard time reading between the lines.