vaughn said:
How so? If it your suggested "change" is to express your anger by simply
ousting one politician in favor of another one, all we will end up with is
more of what we have. -
To bring about change, you need more than anger, you need a plan.
I'm back with a little time, This oil spill is wreaking havoc on life and
business.
But a little slower now.
I don't disagree with that. (you need a plan)
It is only since we have had such an attack on the American way
of life, the freedoms we have, and capitalism that I'm have great concern.
I believe people should have the right to succeed or fail without undo
influence of government. Although I do know, the importance of law
to allow businesses to have a framework of rules to work with each other,
(contract law)
I think the Tea party has the right ideas about small government, less
taxes, and pro growth. I have attended several Tea Parties and recruit
on anyone I can to come and see what we are about. The Tea Party is
fighting a war of ideas, our president has the wrong ideas for America.
The democrats want to say we are racist, it is ideas, not color. They are
losing when that is all they have as ammunition.
Add to that, this is the first year I have ever sent political donations to
candidates, my money is hard earned and harder saved, so I want to make
my donations count. Trying to pick candidates that are close in the poles
but need help. If they are to far behind I don't want my donation to be
wasted, so far aaa, not so good, about 50%. :-(
I did this in word and can't seem to fix the spacing, sorry.
Let's go back to Social security for a moment, becaus that seems to be one
of the things that bothers you. All you need to do fix it is to either
increase SS taxes or reduce benefits. (good luck on getting somebody to
run on THAT platform!) The most painless way to bring the system into
balance is to do more of what Clinton did; delay benefits by raising the
"normal retirement age" to recognize the simple fact that we are living
longer and most of us can work can work longer than our parents did.
Even though I am near Social Security age, I would support a ystem that
ties the SS retirement age to real actuarial data by some formula that
would gradually put the system on more solid financial gronds and take the
decisions away from politicians much the way the SS COLA is done today .
I see maybe five fixes for social security,
1-Raise the retirement age-- this has already been started and it is
probably the easiest.
2-Reduce benefits-- yes a huge lobby against that, somewhat greedy in my
mind.
I need to pay for them because they passed a program that allowed them not
to pay in
enough during there working years to support themselves. Yes, this was done
before I
was born. But I still must pay.
3-Increase workers SS taxes, already 12.% there has got to be a limit.
Yes, I know it is 6.2% for employee and 6.2% for employer, but all comes
from
the labor of the worker.
4-Means testing-- If you have saved and built a large nest egg (savings)
that
generates a retirement income for you then you SS check will reduded or
eliminated.
Also known as penalizing workers that save for there future. Especially hard
on middle
class workers that scrimped and saved there whole life and have savings and
then to
get penalized because they tried to get ahead. (that would be me
5--- Eliminate any COLA's until the program is on a solid footing.
Further, your anger seems to be fixated on the current administration, but
let me remind you that it was the previous ones who got us here. For
example, it was the GWB administration that increased Medicare benefits
without increasing revenues, thus putting the system that many more years
closer to bankruptcy.
Vaughn
You don't need to convince me that GWB was not a good conservative
or helped in anyway to reduce the size of government.
I enjoy the exchange, helps me sharpen my arguments, I'm just a poor
boy from Michigan living in Florida.
Thanks, Mike