Robert Morien said:
And you are that visionary? Let's see some proof
There's no way I can prove it to you or anyone else there are things that
cannot be worked around on a fixed income. Try getting a multi field ring
magnet with 30 fields. retooling is required at $5000.00 for the first part.
What else would justify as proof? A fully functioning computer model? That's
the only way I can do it and I'm Ill equipped to do that too. That's why the
request for research.
I mean really have you been following the thread?
You can't deny that transforming energy is mankinds way of handling energy.
We transform it several different ways *except my way*
elec/kinetic/elec/kinetic/elec, eccentric, infinite. see a cyclic pattern
here?
Ok I'm well aware of everything relative to this device. the main thing is
were handeling energy in it's natural form, Spinning mass ie kinetic energy
which is magnetic charged multiple fields 30.
If I can achieve motive force with 6 fields (no switching). 30 fields should
be no problem with 12 volts dc to suspend and drive the ring at say 30,000
rpms maintaining 30k rpms of a dense spinning mass will require minimal
energy once at operating speed. there is no friction it operates in a
vacume.
So it is safe to say that at this point we have a spinning mass in a vacume
which is conserved, however we also have in the same componant a magnetic
charge also conserved, conservation of angular momentum, and conservation
of linear momentum, provided you look at it across the rings event horison.
That's 4 forms of conservation involved in one componants function.
Now by adding electromagnetic induction coils. This is where everyone says
that "thermodynamics will drag this thing to nothing". I'm sorry to say
that's ultimately wrong as it would violate 4 laws of conservation to do
that. "In the state of conservation in a isolated system energy cannot be
created or destroyed." However transformation is allways the exception to
the rule.
Unity is defined as "in a table of natural sines the radius of the circle is
regarded as unity" the form of a ring is the entire radius of the circle. In
complicated mathematics the result "0" is a depiction of true unity which is
actually 0.999999 infinite. However man rounded it off so it could be used
in the mathematics as we percieve 0 as nil, However in some equations 0 is
considered
an equilibrium. Unity is easily achieved for a short period of time by
simply throwing a frisbe. ok I'm aware that aerodynamics has some effect in
the frisbe's flight. however the true motive force is that unity is achieved
via kinetic energy "spinning mass". 0 seems to be the result in many areas
of physics
weither it is light, time, vectors etc. when 0 is the result it is the
depiction of unity, you are dealing with a condition of unity in whatever
form of physics your dealing with. to furthur your computations replace 0
nill with true unity 0.9999999. if I'm correct you will have fooled the
mathematics into believing that you have achieved unity and what you will
observe is the byproducts of unity.
However this is just a few things i envision based on my research involved
with a simple rotary transformer. I am indeed a visionary, I don't claim to
be the one finishing Einstein's works that's not the goal here. all I want
to do is get this invention into production. If it changes physics by
proving or disproving theories than so be it. if it changes the way you look
at the actual forces involved in physics than so be it. I invented this to
get rich and i'm not afraid to say it.
However above all this device needs furthur research. It is just too
innovative and offends too many theories to be ignored. On the other hand it
uses too many laws in it's function to also be ignored.
Ring