Was Black Dust - Nobody knows

[The real Andy]

Damn thats a huge thread. They only get that big when nobody has any idea of
what is really going on.

 

[Phil Allison]

Damn thats a huge thread. They only get that big when nobody has any idea of
what is really going on.

** It happened when the Rusty Robot crossposted his *answers* to other
NGs.



.............. Phil

 

[Mjolinor]

Damn thats a huge thread. They only get that big when nobody has any idea of
what is really going on.

Then I will have to respectfully suggest that the answer must be 42.

 

[The real Andy]

idea



** It happened when the Rusty Robot crossposted his *answers* to other
NGs.

And no doubt rodbot has been confused by an alias and is responding to
itself. Maybe it will self destruct....

 

[Andrew & Karina]

None of us in the industry are at liberty to reveal what the black dust is ,
coz it's a secret.
All the previous posts were just there to mislead you and keep you from
discovering the truth.

Andrew

 

[Mike D2]

Yes, but, what was the question?

idea

Then I will have to respectfully suggest that the answer must be 42.

 

[DarkMatter]

What do you get when you mulitiply six times nine?

What the **** is "mulitiply"?

 

[Mike Harding]

What the **** is "mulitiply"?

It's what you do when you multiply 6 * 9 and get 42,
I would have thought that was obvious!

Mike Harding

 

[Phil Allison]

It's what you do when you multiply 6 * 9 and get 42,
I would have thought that was obvious!

** Yeah, Jimi Hendrix wrote a song about this .......




............ Phil

 

[DarkMatter]

** Yeah, Jimi Hendrix wrote a song about this .......

Though he never used the non-word "mulitiply".

Also, his 6 by 9 wasn't about math.

 

[Mike Harding]

Never mind the fact that 6 times 9 is 54

Not always...

http://www.panix.com/~wlinden/adams.html
http://www.douglasadams.com/

Sadly missed.

Mike Harding

 

[Phil Allison]

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:56:21 +1000, "Phil Allison"



Though he never used the non-word "mulitiply".

Also, his 6 by 9 wasn't about math.

Quote from JH ....

Yeah (sing the song brother...)
Now if uh, six uh, huh, turned out to be nine
Oh I don't mind, I don't mind uh ( Well all right... )
If all the hippies cut off all their hair
Oh I don't care, oh I don't care.
Dig.


** I'm not so sure it wasn't about maths.




.............. Phil

 

[Rob Judd]

Never mind the fact that 6 times 9 is 54

In base 13 it's 42. D'oh!

Rob

 

[The real Andy]

Quote from JH ....

Yeah (sing the song brother...)
Now if uh, six uh, huh, turned out to be nine
Oh I don't mind, I don't mind uh ( Well all right... )
If all the hippies cut off all their hair
Oh I don't care, oh I don't care.
Dig.


** I'm not so sure it wasn't about maths.

****, here we go again............

 

[DarkMatter]

Quote from JH ....

Yeah (sing the song brother...)
Now if uh, six uh, huh, turned out to be nine
Oh I don't mind, I don't mind uh ( Well all right... )
If all the hippies cut off all their hair
Oh I don't care, oh I don't care.
Dig.


** I'm not so sure it wasn't about maths.

I guess that you didn't notice that the traffic lights had turned
from green to red...

 

[Phil Allison]

You really seem to like that wrod.

** ...... he's from Queensland....




......... Phil

 

[Andy]

You really seem to like that wrod.

Kevin

To what *wrod* are you refering to ???. If he likes his own *wrod*
then it's ok by me. Better than liking someone else's *wrod* as far as
I'm concerned..... Liking another persons *wrod* might mean
homosexuality in some people's view. If you don't like his comments
then F#!K OFF!!!

The Unreal Andy

 

[Harry Conover]

Damn thats a huge thread. They only get that big when nobody has any idea of
what is really going on.

Like most of the really long threads, the correct explanation was
posted quite a few times, but as with some of the easily resolved
urban legends, there will be always people who will believe something
utterly incredible to be going on, then proceed to debate their
fantastic belief to an almost comical extent.

Take a look at soume of the UFO threads for an example of this, or
"The Philadelphia Incident" as another.

Early in the game some of these threads can be fun, but they do tend
to grow stale very fast...particularly when people that cannot support
their point with science based arguments resort to a series of ad
hominem attacks directed against anyone challenging their "knowledge".

Harry C.

 

[DarkMatter]

Like most of the really long threads, the correct explanation was
posted quite a few times, but as with some of the easily resolved
urban legends, there will be always people who will believe something
utterly incredible to be going on, then proceed to debate their
fantastic belief to an almost comical extent.

Take a look at soume of the UFO threads for an example of this, or
"The Philadelphia Incident" as another.

Early in the game some of these threads can be fun, but they do tend
to grow stale very fast...particularly when people that cannot support
their point with science based arguments resort to a series of ad
hominem attacks directed against anyone challenging their "knowledge".

If you are so informed, why don't you declare for us all who was
correct, when and who was incorrect as well?

I say it is airborne particulate, corona, and non-conductive "moist"
substances that do it.

It certainly isn't some "soot" exuding from a component in the
cabinet, or from the cabinet itself, as some have claimed.

 

[Rod Speed]

Like most of the really long threads, the correct explanation was
posted quite a few times, but as with some of the easily resolved
urban legends, there will be always people who will believe something
utterly incredible to be going on, then proceed to debate their
fantastic belief to an almost comical extent.

Take a look at soume of the UFO threads for an example of this, or
"The Philadelphia Incident" as another.

Early in the game some of these threads can be fun, but they do tend
to grow stale very fast...particularly when people that cannot support
their point with science based arguments resort to a series of ad
hominem attacks directed against anyone challenging their "knowledge".

Pity you never managed to produce a shred of evidence
to substantiate your claim about the explanation yourself.

Just proclaimed it.

And you never did manage to explain why electrostatic precipators used
in the same environment dont end up with just the JET BLACK SOOT
seen inside monitors. They end up with just the common dust instead.

Thats nothing like science.