Maker Pro
Maker Pro

super-fast notch-filter for audio signals

  • Thread starter Fabian Wondratschek
  • Start date
F

Fabian Wondratschek

Dear All!

I have an audio signal where I need to filter out a "control signal"
(532 Hz). I used a NE567 for that, but this chip is too slow. The user
can hear a short "cut-off-sound", which is not acceptible for me. The
good thing is, that the signal won't come mixed with audio signals. I
just need to filter it out when there is no other frequency. The
signal itself has some pause (>100ms and <5sec...various) in it. I
don't mind to filter out the 532hz even from the audio, because the
user won't realize that really.

I searched in the NGs and found too many recommendations, ideas,
chips, etc. and now I'm not able to make a decision for which way to
go.

I guess I have make an audio delay (with a delay of 10-30ms). I don't
want to use the audio-delay-chips, because they seem to be too
expensive. The whole app shouldn't cost me more than 5-10 US$/€ AND
(and I guess this is my biggest problem) it should be driven by a
battery (3V or 9V...with a good power-down-mode this should be
possible...hopefully :))

I could do the audio delay with either a DSP (but not preferred,
because I never used them), or a uC with ADC -> memory -> DAC. I'm
still hoping there is another possibility without using DSP/uC, etc.,
because this extend my production costs too much (loading firmware),
but in case I have to use them, it's also ok, as long as I can get the
532Hz filtered out without hearing the "cut-off-sound"/mute. I want to
make a mass-production of the final device, thus any recommended chips
should be available for 10.000 devices.

Every idea/recommendation are highly appreciated!

Thank you very much!

Cheers,
Fabian
 
W

Watson A.Name - 'Watt Sun'

Dear All!

I have an audio signal where I need to filter out a "control signal"
(532 Hz). I used a NE567 for that, but this chip is too slow. The user
can hear a short "cut-off-sound", which is not acceptible for me. The
good thing is, that the signal won't come mixed with audio signals. I
just need to filter it out when there is no other frequency. The
signal itself has some pause (>100ms and <5sec...various) in it. I
don't mind to filter out the 532hz even from the audio, because the
user won't realize that really.

I searched in the NGs and found too many recommendations, ideas,
chips, etc. and now I'm not able to make a decision for which way to
go.

I guess I have make an audio delay (with a delay of 10-30ms). I don't
want to use the audio-delay-chips, because they seem to be too
expensive. The whole app shouldn't cost me more than 5-10 US$/€ AND
(and I guess this is my biggest problem) it should be driven by a
battery (3V or 9V...with a good power-down-mode this should be
possible...hopefully :))

I could do the audio delay with either a DSP (but not preferred,
because I never used them), or a uC with ADC -> memory -> DAC. I'm
still hoping there is another possibility without using DSP/uC, etc.,
because this extend my production costs too much (loading firmware),
but in case I have to use them, it's also ok, as long as I can get the
532Hz filtered out without hearing the "cut-off-sound"/mute. I want to
make a mass-production of the final device, thus any recommended chips
should be available for 10.000 devices.

Every idea/recommendation are highly appreciated!

You can speed up the 567 by reducing the size of the capacitors, but
that also increases the bandwidth.
Thank you very much!
Cheers,
Fabian


--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS? Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the
Subject: line with other stuff. alondra101 <at> hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@
 
F

Fabian Wondratschek

You can speed up the 567 by reducing the size of the capacitors, but
that also increases the bandwidth.

Thanks for the recommendation. I've done this already to the max, but
the 567 is just too slow.

Cheers,
Fabian
 
Top