E
Eeyore
Jamie said:Being it's audio, there shouldn't be any legality issues since that
field has no secrets, you twit!
Clueless arse.
Graham
Jamie said:Being it's audio, there shouldn't be any legality issues since that
field has no secrets, you twit!
Please direct me to a product that you designed yourEeyore said::
I am a true audio expert Michael, John Fields is not. Each to their own.
Graham
Jamie said:Being it's audio, there shouldn't be any legality issues since that
field has no secrets, you twit!
Servo arrangement summat like this?.John Larkin said:Well, neither. I was suggesting a fast opamp *per fet*, with feedback
from the source, to make each fet look like an ideal transconductance
device, perfectly linear, no offset or threshold, all exactly matched,
with very low input capacitance.
But how does improving and parallelizing gate drives cost speed? It
makes my amps faster and a lot more stable. Your amp (the one you
never built) has a couple of wimpy current sources driving 10 fets in
parallel; I'm suggesting a beefy voltage source per fet gate, with
local feedback.
John
Oh please! A mixer, Ouuuhhh...Eeyore said:Jamie wrote:
You're as much of a cnut as I always thought.
Here's an example of the above btw.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Studiomaster-...ryZ23785QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
It was available with various numbers of channels (the above is the largest) and a DSP
reverb option.
Totally my own design thank you, although obviously I had guys working on stuff like pcb
layout and metalwork for me as part of a 3 man team.
Gramm
john said:Servo arrangement summat like this?.John Larkin said:Well, neither. I was suggesting a fast opamp *per fet*, with feedback
from the source, to make each fet look like an ideal transconductance
device, perfectly linear, no offset or threshold, all exactly matched,
with very low input capacitance.
But how does improving and parallelizing gate drives cost speed? It
makes my amps faster and a lot more stable. Your amp (the one you
never built) has a couple of wimpy current sources driving 10 fets in
parallel; I'm suggesting a beefy voltage source per fet gate, with
local feedback.
http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eloadte9.png
[An 'electronic load' project (scrapped). Occasionally blew opamps
consequent to particular dynamics on the Red wire. Traced to Drain/gate
feedback transients coupled with slightly dissimilar current source slew
rates.]
John said:---
And yet you didn't know that the sum of output currents from active IOs
can't exceed the stated maximum current into Vcc or out of GND of logic
chips?
Curious, that...
Answer what question?Eeyore said:Jamie wrote:
Eeyore said:As ever you're quite clueless.
What do you [think] a PCB / chassis mount professional audio XLR 3 pin
gold-plated
connector should cost for example ?
Or an NE5532 ?
Something beyond you..
Cat whisker diodes.
I see you can't even begin to answer the question.
Graham
Jamie said:Oh please! A mixer, Ouuuhhh...
I made mixers, pre amps and power amps years ago.
I was most likely one of the first in my area to have a 400 W RMS per channel stereo
amplifier for mobile use.
Cough, Cough.................................Eeyore said:Jamie wrote:
My DSP reverb code is definitely secret. Just to take one tiny example.
Graham
Frankly speaking, I don't think I would waste the time to exceed youEeyore said:Jamie wrote:
WTF did you expect for audio ? A mouse trap.
Prefer an amplifier ? 1200W. We made tons of these too.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/StudioMaster-...ryZ69962QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
There was a 700W and 1600W version too in the same form factor.
But not 100,000 of them.
Oh lucky you !
I was running a 1 - 2 kW PA rig back then using horn loaded cabs of monitor standard (Electrovoice Sentry IVs) and it used my own quite serious mixer I designed and
built with help from friends in 1971. That's *37* years ago. All discrete btw with class A complementary output stages capable of driving low-Z loads.
You WILL NOT beat my audio experience or expertise.
Graham
Denying them access to the truth means that you're setting yourself up
as a judge of who should and should not have access to the truth because
of what your predictions dictate will happen when the truth is revealed.
Jamie said:Cough, Cough.................................
Jesus Christ...
Who the hell would want your reverb code.
Michael A. Terrell said:Yes, one controls the system, the crunching is done is smaller
processors, not the CENTRAL processor. Those subsystems are worthless
without something to load the code on bootup, and to send commands.
Michael A. Terrell said:You miss the point, as usual. The whole concept is crap, and people
who bought them have been returning them as soon as they realize what a
crappy concept it is. You can't have a station down, even overnight to
do an emergency exchange on unrepairable equipment. If you think the
concept is ancient, it doesn't matter, because its still shit. So much
for you being so great at audio design. There is no reason to use a
digital abortion like that, when analog is simpler, sufficient, and can
be field serviced. Any broadcast engineer worth his pay would run from
crap like that.
Michael A. Terrell said:Any ass can throw together a design for audio equipment and sell it,
Michael A. Terrell said:Try writing AGC code for a multiple telemetry system.
Jamie said:Cough, Cough.................................
Jesus Christ...
Who the hell would want your reverb code.
Michael A. Terrell said:Personally, I think any 'reverb' sucks.