Yannick said:
so i have to put an inductor parallel with the photodiode!?
i was first thinking of using a low load impedance so u still can
measure signals at these frequenties with relative higher junction
capacitance, not?
f = 1/(2*pi*Rload * Cj)
the current in the inductor is 180 out of phase with the current in the
capacitor, if you chose the right value inductor it cancels out this curent
in the capacitance exactly and hence your impedance whomps up. you dont need
a resistor anymore , although you might want to tame its Q slightly, say
100k.
f=1/(2*pi*root(LC))
for 30mhz ive got a inductor wound on a plastic toroid (made from 2mm dia
strimmer wire (plastic) bent round a warm soldering iron tip) it has about
30 turns i think (tuned by trial and error by taking off turn untill its
past point of resonance then puting one back on)
i tried a tunable inductor but even with big heavy screens everywhere it
still picked up no end of interference.
soo if i get it right, u use a photodiode in parralell with an
inductor too increase the impedance in function of the frequentie and
then u use a high Rload to have a relative high voltage with the very
low current through the photodiode and this voltage u put on the gate
of the mosfet. then u use the drain current to make a voltage(with a
resistor
) where u do phase measurement with the original oscillator
sinus wave, right?
yes thats about it. u can use an inductor for the mosfet load too, or a
curent source, or a higher voltage and a plain old resistor. if you tune the
input and the output too much you are prone to oscilation, and of course
phase variance, its just one big trade off noise/amplification/filtering
versus phase variance. lots of playing around unless your expert at
mathmatical modelng.
distance maximum 10m, acuracy as best as possible, i wanted to do
better then 10mm I have made an algoritm wich calculate the distance
when many samples of phase measurements (between 0 and 180 degrees)
are done by different (increasing)frequenties,soo i solved the
ambuguity problem (sorry for my bad english) and it also minimze phase
errors because i compare the ideal triangle wave for every distance
with the measured wave for the distance that has to be calculated, the
best match is the measured distance. it's a kind of fourier
transformation but with triangle waves (because phase measurement
withing intervals of 0 and 180 degrees of increasing frequenties are
triangles in function of the frequentie).
of course with 10m your going to have more than one cycle of delay with
50mhz, and so you measurment will overflow, good luck with 10mm resolution.
returned signal strenght at 10m is going to be oh so low, you wld need i
think an APD and not to forget a good lense, and a white target.
i gues you would need to be sure your signals are the precise shape you
calculate for. this isnt easy with hi frequency non sinewaves. maybe trial
and error and some calibration might be required.
i have two 30mhz signals (32khz apart) going into an xor gate and the signal
that comes out looks awfull after the first low pass filter.
indeed that problem i also have, i am now seperate transmitter and
receiver completely , this will solve it for now
you need to screen things well and seperate power supplys ( of course) and
also carefull ground planes. if you seperate them to far u then have long
signal wires wich can also be problomatic. also your beam has to travel down
the center of your line of sight of the PD if you use a lense.
thats already good, how do you measure phase difference? i am gonne
use the ad8035 from analog devices. The dual gate mosfet u are using,
can you give the type nr. ?
wel i cheat a bit at the moment im using a hp 5328 timer counter, wich has
sub picosecond average time interval measuring, however i use frequency
shifting to lower the frequency down to 32 khz, but keeping the same phase
angle so i can multiply the delay by 1000 or even much more, so i only need
to measure down to 10ns wich u can easily get modules to measure that, or
even just measure the average dc level of the pulse from the edge detector.
i might even put an on board micro although doubt il have enough enthusiasm
left to do that for a while, not sure if it is easy enought to get this to
the stage where it could be a viable comercial product, do any such exist ?
ive heard of some devices wich use multiple receivers at diferent focus
points/angles to detect distance.
the variable bandwidth with amplitude could be an issue if you use this
device before the synchrounous detector.
im using a 5mw red laser, a ca3209 APD fed into a bf998 dual gate mosfet
wich is fed into a an emiter folower and a PIN agc circuit wich goes into a
sa605 fm mixer ic although im thinking this is cuasing some problems at the
moment. i might go back to the string of ecl diferential amplifiers i used
before.
the delay cuased by varying the gain with the PIN is fortunatly in the
opesoite direction to the rest of the circuit, ie stronger signal means
longer delay, but more atenuation actualy means less delay, unfortunatly its
hard to get the two to cancel perfectly, but i live in hope.
i might up the main frequency but first i need to find another two crystals
that are 32khz apart wich is dificult. i might change the 32khz to 455khz
and use proper IF filters rather than made from discrete wich i think is
cuasing a problem, or even have 2 IF frequencies or even lower the frequency
still further say 100hz then just do low pass filtering, but then wld need
virtualy dc coupled stages.
I had hoped to use a 32khz crystal as a IF filter but this wasnt very good
for phase variance, although jitter was non existant. .. sigh..
unfortunatly i cldnt get 455khz filters from RS or farnell, does anyone know
where i can get them easily in the UK?
i think you have a very chalenging project. good luck and keep me posted
please
sory if my english is hard to understand at times too, i have no real excuse
for it tho.
Colin =^.^=
