Haha.. Dan is out of his freaking mind. My websites have never, not
once, said anything whatever about investing or anything about any
investment opportunity. One has to wonder what motivates Dan to make
such baseless and pointless remarks. lol.
I don't see where Dans mental state has any bearing on this topic.
Attacking people and speculating on their mental state or motivations
does not make for a credible posting.
You DO want people to believe what you write, don't you?
The first part, "has offered no product for years" appears correct.
Perhaps I'm mistaken. Does your company sell products or services
or did it in the past sell anything? Do you have any examples of the
kinds of things your company has sold? Testimonials? Pictures?
Articles in newspapers, magazines, blogs, press releases?
Since I haven't heard anything about your company except from you,
and web searches yield very little information, I am most curious
about it's track record and successes.
Now, the second part "only an investor sniff" is harder to define.
I believe he meant that the website was essentially designed like
'teaser' adverts which are lean on substance and high on getting
people interested enough to inquire further.
Oh, the man works for the oil companies. And the oil companies are
constitutionally incapable of allowing fair competition, because they
know in any fair exchange, they'd lose big time! lol.
Playing the conspiracy theory card is not going to gain you credibility.
I was not aware that Dan was an oil company shill but if you have any
evidence of this, I would like to see it.
Okay, solar panels at $0.07 per peak watt generate about 1.2 to 2.4 kWh
per year very reliably at no additional costs. ...
In fact oil would have to sell for around $6 to be
competitive with my solar energy.
Okay, but solar panels at $4.00 per peak watt are not going to be
competitive with oil. As I understand it, even you can't buy or
build panels at $.07/watt for at least several years.
Now, what this means is that I can enter the market by taking solar
electricity and making hydrogen and using that hydrogen to make oil
from low-rank carbon sources, like coal, biomass or even carbon-dioxide
- and still make a profit, despite the inefficiencies - by selling in
direct competition to the oil companies.
Agreed, no brainer. If you can produce solar PV that cheap then, as
you say, you can make a killing by using it to make synthetic fuels,
refine aluminum, produce fertilizers and other such energy intensive
things. A perfect job for spin-off companies.
Charging very low cost utility scale stationary flow batteries and
distributing the power by HVDC network, and using HVDC to power
roadways which power directly electric vehicles - eliminating the need
for oil altogether is clearly a better way to go, and doesn't require
futuristic super batteries or unreliable hydrogen storage.
I don't think powered roads are all that practical. Something like
the Taxi 2000 system seems to have more advantages.
I'm pretty sure that HVDC is not the best way to distribute power.
AC seems much more practical for general use.
This change will happen. Its happening now. Oil companies can either
get on board and support inevitable change. Or they can discredit
themselves by narrow mean-spirited focus in a vain attempt to derail
the inevitable by spreading lies and disinformation.
How does this has any bearing on this thread?
Clearly Don has chosen his side - the losing one.
I haven't seen evidence that Don (or even Dan) has joined the
evil oil conspiracy. Besides, I'm not so clear that the oil
companies are the losing side. They've got all the money, influence
and infrastructure.
Anthony
