Well, sci.electronics.design is often invaded by poseurs who want to
argue arcania about climate change or physics or evolution, and all
sorts of stuff. The arguments are usually fuzzy and oriented to,
indeed, proving the posters right and the rest of us dumb. They don't
seem to want to argue with genuine experts in those fields, so they
come here. And they don't design electronics.
Some people really like to bash engineers. Probably because we make
stuff that works, and they don't. Also, probably, because we have fun,
and they don't.
It's a sick world, isn't it? <<<G>>>
You seem to fit the pattern perfectly. If not, show us some real,
serious electronics.
You have the right to believe as you wish. I've built plenty of
circuits, but undoubtedly it wouldn't impress you. Does it even
matter? For the moment I'm into writing some semiconductor
fabrication software. You know, dopant densities, metal &
semiconductor selection, contact area, etc. The last circuit I built,
months ago, was an electrometer (~ 3fA bias current), connected to a
voltage-to-current amp driving an LED, which was connected to a 10ft
fiber optic cable going to a photodiode, connected to a FET op-amp.
Prior to that I designed an entire Ground penetrating radar (GPR),
utilizing Fourier transforms in deconvolution routines, capable of
detecting a metal object the size of a quarter buried 20 feet in good
ground. Lets not talk about "bad" ground, please. ;-) Prior to that I
designed a low end Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) system.
Paul