I knew it needed a dedicated circuit. After I completed the install, I
realized the generator side of the install is not to code since the
other half of the 220v feed from the generator supplies power to other
outlets.
However, it didn't occur to me that a single twist lock outlet on the
grid circuit that the furnace could plug into was a code violation. I'm
guessing it has to do with the possibility of accidently plugging the
furnace cord into another twist lock outlet on a different circuit. I'm not
too concerned with that in my house since the only twist lock outlets are
specifically for the furnace.
As of a few months ago, my town will no longer do any inspections or
issue permits for any plumbing or electrical work done by homeowners.
I interpret that to mean I better not ask my town electrical inspector,
because we are now in a "don't ask/don't tell" environment. Judging by
the work some of the structural and electrical "improvements" the
previous owners of my house did on their own, this seems like a
great way to improve building safety. *sigh* I guess I'll be visiting
the library to see if they have a copy of the NEC with a loophole.
At least in the mean time if I subtract the numerous (several hazardous
and easily avoided) electrical code violations I've taken out of my wiring,
from this one violation I'm still a net improvement in my code compliance
since I've moved in.
It would also be mighty stupid. In my case the furnace is normally
supplied by a 120v circuit.
It should meet code IF you put wheels on the furnace; then it cannot be
considered stationary.
While it wouldn't suprise me if wheels on a gas furnace on a slightly
sloped concrete floor is an acceptable loophole to the NEC, I'd rather
live with a "seemingly safe" electrical code violation than a "seemingly
unsafe" natural gas problem.