Sorry, wrong syntax, try this:
we == YOU && I;
No, AlwaysWrong Jr., it's not.
Hope this helps![]()
You? No, you're helpless.
Sorry, wrong syntax, try this:
we == YOU && I;
Hope this helps![]()
For that matter, why doesn't God just rain manna down from heaven, so
none of us has to do anything?
Why isn't electricity free?
Tim said:-- snip --
Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.
Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.While we're on this subject, why don't women (and men, for that matter)
come with instruction manuals?
Why don't my elected officials pay their own way, so I don't have to pay
taxes?
For that matter, why doesn't God just rain manna down from heaven, so
none of us has to do anything?
Why do I have to learn to read?
Why, if China attacks the US, will my sons get drafted?
Why isn't electricity free?
Why do my joints ache in the winter (and summer).
Etc.
Who implied "all" parts needed to be the same? Obviously not possible.
Granted, with specialization, this ideal becomes less relevant.
But
what about the rest of the field? The foundations, so to speak, that
set the tone for this discipline.
I am referring to more "basic" applications, and there are far too
many to mention,
that could benefit from a periodic consolidation of
both design and componentry.
IMHO there is a tipping point
beyond which choice and redundancy costs
disproportionately more. If you don't believe it, take the misses into
a store that sells specialty bathroom fittings![]()
Elsewhere, this type of cost may be better hidden, beneath a veneer of
complacency.
blue is for metal film. 1% is the brown band spaced differently at one
end.
With the computers we have now, there is no consequence to
bad software, it all runs the same.
It's cheaper. Burning a brownish lettering into a black plastic chip
costs less than silk screen printing.
It is next to 'A', 'B',
and spelled 'C'.
Hope this helps![]()
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:13:33 -0800, Jon Kirwan
[snip]Thanks. But while we've been through everything that might
break up people (and far more, since we have two disabled
children, one profoundly autistic and experiencing grand mal
seizures that have broken her arms, smashed out her teeth,
given her 3rd degree burns over largish areas of sensitive
skin, and threatens to kill her every single waking day), we
have found our way and become far stronger and more profound
friends for all that we've been through with each other, too.
Those experiences have shaped us and there is no way anyone
else could ever come anywhere close to having and knowing
what we know without having to say so much as a single word
about it, now. We can just look for a second a each other
and communicate so much. Our focus is no longer on what is
between us, but on what is outside of us -- larger goals
beyond our family and towards helping others.
There is nothing anyone else could ever hope to offer that
would cause me to spend a single second considering losing
all that -- except perhaps some permanent security and love
for my daughter after we die, I suppose. (No contract, no
trust fund amount, can force love and good relationship.) On
that odd score, both my wife and I would simply look at each
other with eyes that say, "yes, go for it you idiot." But we
wouldn't lose what we've gained over the years, either.
It's a powerful feeling to have been through so much and to
have survived everything others go through and far more and
still remain standing and all the stronger for the challenges
experienced. It does give truth to that saw, "what doesn't
kill you makes you stronger."
Jon
Jon, A caution I just encountered. I don't know whether it applies in
your state or not: Here in AZ, when my autistic grandson (soon) turns
18, his parents must apply for guardianship and pay about $2K in
INVESTIGATION and attorney fees to prove they are fit to continue as
guardians :-(
We need to start killing off government workers.
Jan Panteltje said:LOL
That is why NASA has to hire them to get to the spaced-out station.
I remember little portable Russian TVs, 'Rigonda' in the seventies.
Nice and small, all transistor, easy serviceable,
in the UK, but the UK forced them to put in a large bulky UK made UHF tuner.
I was told that hat was the condition for them to sell in the UK...
I had a good 'commie' flip mirror 35 mm camera too, for very little money,
'Werra' IIRC.
Put a good lens on it, beautiful.
Things did break down over time though, but same with ipod, pad, Philips TVs.
It is a pity media always make people in US think the Russians had inferior products,
it simply is not true, everybody had some bad products.
Why the scare of the missiles, and the missile treaties?
And then there is China, now putting out more engineers than the US ever did it seems.
TheGlimmerMan said:Chips were NEVER "silk screen printed". Not ever... not once.
[Lots of good stuff deleted]
Jon Kirwan said:There is a
lot that is bad here, and a terrible lack of courage and
imagination in gov't workers that is frightening at times.
But there is good, too. Especially down closer to the
trenches where most of us live.
...which is pretty impressive, to me, when AFAIK many of those low-level
workers down in the trenches often make little more than minimum wage.
Do you think the shift from Kulongoski back to Kitzhaber is going to make any
difference in your case? Or are the governors at such a high level they
really don't influence this sort of issue one way or the other?
That investigator who didn't think your wife was fit does sound like the kind
of government worker that shouldn't be one :-( ; I'm sorry you and your wife
had to go through that. (I was briefly guardian for my stepfather, and there
the investigation was all of filling out some form and a 5-minute phone
interview -- I found it more a formality than anything else.)
TheGlimmerMan said:You're about as far off the mark as someone claiming to have an
education in the field can possibly get.
You are not a computer scientist or an electrical engineer. Hell, you
would **** up qualifying as a layman.
You are one of those guys that stands around with your thumb up your
ass acting like you belong to the group. Yet half of the CRAP that
issues from your MOUTH is so fucking immature and bogus, that you should
be drummed out of the industry and never be allowed near it again.
If we did more of that to dweeby dumbfucks like you, we would have a
better free world. Instead, we have to endure stupid, uneducated,
uninformed, asinine cracks from assholes like you that claim to know
about things, but obviously knows nothing, as evidenced by the fucking
crack.
Idiots like YOU are the reason why kids today are not getting educated.
I sure hope you don't have any that you are raising to be just as utterly
fucking stupid as you are. That's all society needs. More dumbfucks
expounding total bullshit as fact.
TheGlimmerMan said:Chips were NEVER "silk screen printed". Not ever... not once.
I've seen it done, in a factory. But there is no paste and screeding,
it's blasted through. All it made was a faint hiss, and then another for
cleaning the screen.
[...]
TheGlimmerMan said:It's cheaper. Burning a brownish lettering into a black plastic chip
costs less than silk screen printing.
Chips were NEVER "silk screen printed". Not ever... not once.
I've seen it done, in a factory. But there is no paste and screeding,
it's blasted through. All it made was a faint hiss, and then another for
cleaning the screen.
[...]
That is NOT "silk screen printing".
That is spray over stencil.
That is NOT "silk screen printing".TheGlimmerMan wrote:
It's cheaper. Burning a brownish lettering into a black plastic chip
costs less than silk screen printing.
Chips were NEVER "silk screen printed". Not ever... not once.
I've seen it done, in a factory. But there is no paste and screeding,
it's blasted through. All it made was a faint hiss, and then another for
cleaning the screen.
[...]
That is spray over stencil.
ROTFL! AlwaysWrong, you're a RIOT!
TheGlimmerMan wrote:
It's cheaper. Burning a brownish lettering into a black plastic chip
costs less than silk screen printing.
Chips were NEVER "silk screen printed". Not ever... not once.
I've seen it done, in a factory. But there is no paste and screeding,
it's blasted through. All it made was a faint hiss, and then another for
cleaning the screen.
[...]
That is NOT "silk screen printing".
That is spray over stencil.
ROTFL! AlwaysWrong, you're a RIOT!
You don't understand governments very well. The US didn't buy a spares
package for the F-16, to keep it's apparent costs down. Whenever they need
spares they're purchased in onesies, sometimes requiring re-tooling.
I can't say how they were printed in the past but I think this is oneTheGlimmerMan said:TheGlimmerMan wrote:
It's cheaper. Burning a brownish lettering into a black plastic chip
costs less than silk screen printing.
Chips were NEVER "silk screen printed". Not ever... not once.
I've seen it done, in a factory. But there is no paste and screeding,
it's blasted through. All it made was a faint hiss, and then another for
cleaning the screen.
[...]
That is NOT "silk screen printing".
That is spray over stencil.
ROTFL! AlwaysWrong, you're a RIOT!
I find it amusing when a dopey fucktard takes a known acronym and
twists it so blatantly that it shows his utter stupidity before even a
word is spoken. You are one such dopey fucktard.
Spray shot through a screen is STENCIL printing., whether the screen
has a mesh or not. The media is sprayed.
SILK SCREEN printing is where the print media is forced through a
masked screen directly onto the target surface. The media is wiped.
The riot here is that you actually think you had a proper reason to be
laughing, much less doing so while rolling on the floor.
I think your mental age has been progressing backward for about the
last nine years now. You lose three years as each new year passes.
A couple more years and you will be posting mere babbling... wait!
Too late!
Bullshit. Light blue was chosen, and then adopted by nearly all the
makers because it renders the stripes the most readable. It also shows
heat damage by discoloration better.
Blue is NOT "for metal film"