Bottom line - Bell's lawyers screwed up.
In the original 1953 patent there are 10 claims. The word "pair" appears a total of ten times in four of the claims. Nowhere does it say something like "two or more". If it had, Bell would have had the first patent for an "integrated circuit" six *years* ahead of TI.
OK, it's never as simple as that. Sidney's parts did not have electrical isolation between individual transistor elements, so it was more of a 5-layer device rather than individual transistors connected together in a circuit. Still, Bell would have had something to use in a court challenge. Given their size relative to just about everybody, let alone an oil well instrument company, it would have been quite a fight.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US2663806
ak