G
-
Categories
-
Platforms
-
Content
gearhead said:
Just why the heck is it that AMERICANS are so gullible ? Presumably it has to be
a failure of education, possibly combined with an inclination (likely related to
the influence of religion) to believe in implausible fantastic miracles.
Graham
EdV said:Is the salt dissolved in the water acting as a catalyst in cahoots
with RF?
Yeah, it is mighty "gaggy." That being said, America is big place
with lots of people. If only 10% of the adults were(are?) complete
dolts that population would compare nicely to that of Belgium except
they probably they wouldn't enjoy Belgian food or beer or living in
Europe with the art galleries and extra days of vacation. In fact
they would not compare nicely to Belgium at all. But of course that
is not the job of dolts.
And now, of course I now nominate myself as one of them, with:
Is the salt dissolved in the water acting as a catalyst in cahoots
with RF?
Just why the heck is it that AMERICANS are so gullible ? Presumably it has to be
a failure of education, possibly combined with an inclination (likely related to
the influence of religion) to believe in implausible fantastic miracles.
Sure it is. Also spelled sometimes as "gullable".
Apparently. He's done demos by adding salt to tap water to enable the
RF reaction. Scan Google or YouTube for 'John Kanzius'.
The process requires more energy than the reaction produces, but it's
still interesting. Predictably, this point is overlooked in nearly
every report on the topic.
Also the difficulty of seeing a hydrogen flame is overlooked (no pun
intended)...
"Pure hydrogen-oxygen flames are nearly invisible to the naked eye, as
illustrated by the faintness of flame from the main Space Shuttle
engines (as opposed to the easily visible flames from the shuttle
boosters). Thus it is difficult to visually detect if a hydrogen leak
is burning."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen
Michael
I have a small Hyrogen-Oxygen torch for welding fairly refractory
metals such as platinum-- the flame is not very visible at all, just a
small cone of blue flame near the "torch" (a blunt hypodermic needle).
But if you heat something up with it the object quickly becomes
incandescent.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
From page 91:
Just why the heck is it that AMERICANS are so gullible ?
whit3rd said:Actually, Rustum Roy is a serious scientist, and he confirmed the
result; the reporter didn't do (IMHO) a good job of reporting.
The cracking of water to H2 and O2 can be accomplished by
electrolysis, but only as a very lossy process, usually with sulphuric acid
added.
Apparently, a simple saltwater solution, with RF excitation, does
better (and RF power sources are VERY efficient compared to the usual
banked-rectifier electrolysis power plants). If they can separate the
H2 and O2 products, it's a technology win.
If they can't separate the products, it's just another way to make
Wood's gas (useful in small quantities, hazardous if scaled up).
Yeah, it is mighty "gaggy." That being said, America is big place
with lots of people. If only 10% of the adults were(are?) complete
dolts that population would compare nicely to that of Belgium except
they probably they wouldn't enjoy Belgian food or beer or living in
Europe with the art galleries and extra days of vacation. In fact
they would not compare nicely to Belgium at all. But of course that
is not the job of dolts.
And now, of course I now nominate myself as one of them, with:
Is the salt dissolved in the water acting as a catalyst in cahoots
with RF?
Not that I expect a net energy gain here but any sort catalytic
reaction that uses materials more common than palladium is
interesting.
How do we actually know it's any more efficient than conventional electrolysis ?
I'm very doubtful about the true usefulness of highly explosive gas mixtures
too.
electrolysis,
but only as a very lossy process, usually with sulphuric acid added.
Apparently, a simple saltwater solution, with RF excitation, does
He was just testing your level of gullibility.
Bwuahahaha!