Pig charged with identity theft

[Michael Gross]

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011...arged-with-identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

Lymon Taylor, 33, was freed on $5,000 bond Wednesday, the Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel reported. He was charged with felony identity theft,
which carries a potential sentence of six years in prison.

The Milwaukee Police Department suspended Taylor, spokeswoman Anne
Schwartz said.

Investigators said another man, Lee Ellis, told them he and Taylor
discovered a California company that said it could repair credit ratings
and charged a $2,500 fee. Both were given Social Security numbers and
told to use them with their own names and a different address.

Taylor was allegedly using a number assigned to a 7-year-old boy in
Racine, Wis. The boy's parents insisted on prosecution, police said.

The police officer allegedly used the new number to obtain a loan for
the purchase of a 2007 Mercedes-Benz S550 with a Blue Book value of
around $48,000.

 

[Rich Grise]

Michael Gross wrote:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011...arged-with-identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!

I guess Big Brother is here.

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

Michael Gross wrote:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011...arged-with-identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/
A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!

Wow! You've been out of the loop. SSNs are issued pretty much at birth, and
have been for forty years.

I guess Big Brother is here.

If you think this is a big example of BigBrotherism, you're sleeping under a
rock.

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

There is a lot more to a President than a nutcase. We already have one of
those.

 

[Rich Grise]

There is a lot more to a President than a nutcase. We already have one of
those.

Can you be any more specific?

What, exactly, makes you consider him a nutcase? Is it just that he's
adamant about the Constitution, that he believes in personal Liberty,
or is it that he's not a war addict?

I mean, really. Show me some facts and figures that make you consider
Dr. Paul a "nutcase?"

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

Can you be any more specific?

Whether you like it or not, the President is also the Commander in Chief. Ron
Paul would be a miserable choice, for this most important of Presidential
functions.

What, exactly, makes you consider him a nutcase? Is it just that he's
adamant about the Constitution, that he believes in personal Liberty,
or is it that he's not a war addict?

Whether you like it or not, that's the President's most important function.

I mean, really. Show me some facts and figures that make you consider
Dr. Paul a "nutcase?"

Oh, good grief, you're dense.

 

[Rich Grise]

Where have you been, Rich?

Apparently under a rock somewhere.

They wouldn't let our boys out of the
hospital until they had social security numbers. They're 17 and 12 now.

Fortunately neither them pulled '666', although there have been times
that we've wondered...

I wonder when they'll go to tattoos.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

Have you lifted their long hair to check their foreheads? ;-)

Last time they tattooed IDs on people, didn't they put them on their
forearms?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

Can you be any more specific?

Whether you like it or not, the President is also the Commander in Chief.
Ron Paul would be a miserable choice, for this most important of
Presidential functions.
[/QUOTE]
Ah. So you're simply a war addict.

Somebody needs to get America into rehab for its addiction to warmaking.

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

Ah. So you're simply a war addict.

What's left of your drug addled mind does tend to jump in the stupid
direction. Nothing new.

Somebody needs to get America into rehab for its addiction to warmaking.

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

 

[Rich Grise]

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

And how much will we have to borrow from China to do so?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

As always, you're blind to reality. Your questions is as nonsensical as your
politics.

 

[Rich Grise]

Republicans will say it's for law and order. Democrats will say it's to
better provide warm fuzzies at need. Their corporate masters will
dictate it, because it'll just make us all better robots.

(Yup, I'm feeling particularly cynical tonight).

Well, if you don't like a corporation, simply don't buy their product.
You don't have that option when the taxman comes to confiscate your
paycheck.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

As always, you're blind to reality. Your questions is as nonsensical as
your politics.

And how much will we have to borrow from China to do so?

[/QUOTE]

Ah. No answer, so go ad hominem.

Does anyone in the country know what we're trying to accomplish by
spending billions of dollars and getting dozens of our brothers and
sisters and sons and daughters killed?

Do you, or do you not, have an answer to the question?
What, exactly. are we trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

I mean, if you don't even know the purpose of the invasion, then what's the
point, other than for the macho hotshot bullies getting their rocks off?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

Ah. No answer, so go ad hominem.

Does anyone in the country know what we're trying to accomplish by
spending billions of dollars and getting dozens of our brothers and
sisters and sons and daughters killed?

Yes. It's clear you're too stupid to even listen, though.

Do you, or do you not, have an answer to the question?

Certainly, but there is no point in repeating what I've told you a hundred
times. You'll never listen.

What, exactly. are we trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Pissing you off. There, maybe that'll sink in.

I mean, if you don't even know the purpose of the invasion, then what's the
point, other than for the macho hotshot bullies getting their rocks off?

Good grief, you're stupid.

 

[Tom Biasi]

"Rich Grise" wrote in message

Republicans will say it's for law and order. Democrats will say it's to
better provide warm fuzzies at need. Their corporate masters will
dictate it, because it'll just make us all better robots.

(Yup, I'm feeling particularly cynical tonight).

Well, if you don't like a corporation, simply don't buy their product.
You don't have that option when the taxman comes to confiscate your
paycheck.

Thanks,
Rich

OK I give up. Who's using Rich's computer?

 

[Rich Grise]

Ah. No answer, so go ad hominem.

Does anyone in the country know what we're trying to accomplish by
spending billions of dollars and getting dozens of our brothers and
sisters and sons and daughters killed?

Yes. It's clear you're too stupid to even listen, though.[/QUOTE]

Not if you'll answer my question.

Certainly, but there is no point in repeating what I've told you a hundred
times. You'll never listen.

Why not go ahead and give it then and _SEE_ if I reject it.

Pissing you off. There, maybe that'll sink in.

So, you're spending billions of dollars of our tax money and
getting people killed, for the express purpose of "pissing off
Rich Grise?"

Good grief, you're stupid.

But do you have an answer to my question?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

Not if you'll answer my question.

Because I have, *many* times. ...as have others. You're either too stupid to
read or you don't want the answer. Either way, I'm sure you'll continue to
drone on.

Why not go ahead and give it then and _SEE_ if I reject it.

Nope. BTDT, and you drone on.

So, you're spending billions of dollars of our tax money and
getting people killed, for the express purpose of "pissing off
Rich Grise?"

Some people need killing. Sorry if that offends you.

But do you have an answer to my question?

Yes.

 

[Rich Grise]

Because I have, *many* times. ...as have others.

When? Can you cite?

You're either too
stupid to
read or you don't want the answer. Either way, I'm sure you'll continue
to drone on.

So, remind me. I _definitely_ want the answer, because I don't like seeing
America wasting lives and treasure with no purpose. Is it imperialism? Do
you intend to colonize? What's Afghanistan got that we want?

What, exactly, is the US administration trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Why have you spent half a thread evading the question? Are you afraid?

Just remind me of the answer you've allegedly given me but I've rejected, if
there really is such a thing. Please, have mercy on my simple, drug-addled
mind, and tell me, in small words, what exactly is the US administration
trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

If you'd answer the question, or remind me of the answer that you've
allegedly given "many" times, then we'd have a topic for lively debate -
but refusing to answer by saying "You'd just reject it" is just lame
weaseling.

Are you just another nym for AlwaysWrong?

You know, there's no shame in simply not knowing - in fact, "I do not know"
is the first stage of wisdom.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

When? Can you cite?

Don't be ridiculous.

So, remind me. I _definitely_ want the answer, because I don't like seeing
America wasting lives and treasure with no purpose. Is it imperialism? Do
you intend to colonize? What's Afghanistan got that we want?

You're such a liar.

What, exactly, is the US administration trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Why have you spent half a thread evading the question? Are you afraid?

I'm not afraid, just tired of moron, like you, pretending that they don't know
why we're there.

Just remind me of the answer you've allegedly given me but I've rejected, if
there really is such a thing. Please, have mercy on my simple, drug-addled
mind, and tell me, in small words, what exactly is the US administration
trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

You're doing a good job of pretending to be a leftist.

If you'd answer the question, or remind me of the answer that you've
allegedly given "many" times, then we'd have a topic for lively debate -
but refusing to answer by saying "You'd just reject it" is just lame
weaseling.

Are you just another nym for AlwaysWrong?

Now you're simply removing all doubt that you're a liar.

You know, there's no shame in simply not knowing - in fact, "I do not know"
is the first stage of wisdom.

I know and *you* know. Stop pretending to be a moron.

 

[Rich Grise]

I know and *you* know. Stop pretending to be a moron.

So, test me. What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in
Afghanistan?

You keep telling me I know, but I don't, because according to you, my
drug-addled pea-brain will reject your answer.

Are you too lame or too cowardly to actually answer the question, or
do you simply not know?

What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Are you too cowardly to tell the truth?

Have you no testicles?

Are you simply another nym for AlwaysWrong?

Please, inquiring minds want to know:

What is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan? Are you
too lame to admit you don't know? Is it some deep dark secret? Is it
too embarrassing, or humiliating, to tell the truth? Come on, man up!

What is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Thanks,
Rich