Maker Pro
Maker Pro

make thermal imaging camera

M

Mike

Is it feasible to make a low cost (£/$100) thermal image camera? Anyone have a
design available, or know of somewhere that sells such a thing?
Tia
 
F

Frithiof Andreas Jensen

Mike said:
Is it feasible to make a low cost (£/$100) thermal image camera? Anyone have a
design available, or know of somewhere that sells such a thing?

I have often fantasized about building a Nipkow IR camera based on an
pyroelectric sensor. I haven't though enough to know if it is viable.
 
R

Rene Tschaggelar

Mike said:
Is it feasible to make a low cost (£/$100) thermal image camera? Anyone have a
design available, or know of somewhere that sells such a thing?
Tia
What thermal imaging ?
Black and white cameras go into the near IR, and are therefore good
for rather high temperatures, say 800 Degrees up.

When you talk abou body temperature, 20degC, then the wavelengths
are in the 10um region. In order to get rid of the camera temperature
itself, they tend to run in liquid nitrogen/helium.
There are camera receivers, perhaps of the HgTe type,
yes, but the liquid gaz stuff is somewhat unhandy.

Rene
 
I

Ian Stirling

Frithiof Andreas Jensen said:
I have often fantasized about building a Nipkow IR camera based on an
pyroelectric sensor. I haven't though enough to know if it is viable.

The bandwidth sucks, and the sensitivity isn't great.
I suspect the easiest way may be a couple of r/c servos, and a lens
(frensel, polythene) and wiggle it under computer control.
 
J

Jim Yanik

What thermal imaging ?
Black and white cameras go into the near IR, and are therefore good
for rather high temperatures, say 800 Degrees up.

When you talk abou body temperature, 20degC, then the wavelengths
are in the 10um region. In order to get rid of the camera temperature
itself, they tend to run in liquid nitrogen/helium.
There are camera receivers, perhaps of the HgTe type,
yes, but the liquid gaz stuff is somewhat unhandy.

Rene

I believe Texas Instruments has a non-cooled IR sensor that responds to
body heat.A microbolometer design,IIRC. I've seen ads for "low-cost"
thermal vision units for firefighters to wear while fighting fires
indoors,helmet-mounted,or handheld.
 
J

John Larkin

Is it feasible to make a low cost (£/$100) thermal image camera? Anyone have a
design available, or know of somewhere that sells such a thing?
Tia

Considering that they sell for $8-30K, it seems unlikely.

You could probably build a very slow single-sensor, low resolution
mechanically-scanned thermal imager pretty cheap.

John
 
I

Ian Stirling

John Larkin said:
Considering that they sell for $8-30K, it seems unlikely.

You could probably build a very slow single-sensor, low resolution
mechanically-scanned thermal imager pretty cheap.

I suspect the sweet spot would be somewhere between 4 and 10 sensors, for
many applications.
 
M

Mike

And apparently can't read descriptions very well either.
That's not a camera.

Well the heading says "Thermal Imaging Cameras and accessories" shows a BIG
picture of a camera and lists several items. Ok I guess it may be an accessory -
but if you go to that link it tells you sod-all apart from the fact it's a
"JTL-OPT4" a 24V option (for WHAT?) can ship in 2-3 days and will cost $99. Oh
yeah - I'll take a dozen of those then.

"And apparently can't read descriptions very well either", ideed! What
description for god's sake. Does saying that make you feel superior is some way?
You need help pal. Perhaps *you* can read a description of something from fresh
air - but then I suspect you've been sniffing the mushrooms (or something else)
again.
 
I

Ian Stirling

Mike said:
Well the heading says "Thermal Imaging Cameras and accessories" shows a BIG
picture of a camera and lists several items. Ok I guess it may be an accessory -
but if you go to that link it tells you sod-all apart from the fact it's a
"JTL-OPT4" a 24V option (for WHAT?) can ship in 2-3 days and will cost $99. Oh
yeah - I'll take a dozen of those then.

But, looking at the other items around that area makes it clear it's an
accessory.
All the thermal IR cameras on that page are over 5K.
A horrible page, but you can still be almost certain that it's not a camera,
any more than the "germanium lens" is.
 
P

Palinurus

Jim said:
I believe Texas Instruments has a non-cooled IR sensor that responds to
body heat.A microbolometer design,IIRC. I've seen ads for "low-cost"
thermal vision units for firefighters to wear while fighting fires
indoors,helmet-mounted,or handheld.

I recall that certain top-of-the-line Cadillacs began to come out with
thermal imagers coupled to a heads-up display a couple of years ago, as
an aid to night driving. The actual camera head is not extraordinarily
complex, but it has also not been much impacted by the economies of
scale, the same thing that changed simple calculators from expensive and
exotic to virtual throwaways. I suspect that the availability of thermal
cameras will ease in the future, but I too want it now.
 
J

John Larkin

All the thermal IR cameras on that page are over 5K.
A horrible page, but you can still be almost certain that it's not a camera,
any more than the "germanium lens" is.

Just the Ge lens is $1600, so even if you had a cheap detector array
you'd have to spend a bundle on the optics. Maybe a reflector would be
cheaper. The problem with a thermal imager is that everything looks
like a source; imagine building a visible-range camera that worked at
incandescent temperatures.

This area seems ripe for cheap consumer versions one of these days.

I'd love to have a thermal imager for production check of PC boards,
but they're still too expensive.

John
 
I

Ian Stirling

Palinurus said:
I recall that certain top-of-the-line Cadillacs began to come out with
thermal imagers coupled to a heads-up display a couple of years ago, as
an aid to night driving. The actual camera head is not extraordinarily
complex, but it has also not been much impacted by the economies of

I think that was near-visible IR imagers IIRC, not thermal.
 
I

Ian Stirling

John Larkin said:
Just the Ge lens is $1600, so even if you had a cheap detector array
you'd have to spend a bundle on the optics. Maybe a reflector would be
cheaper. The problem with a thermal imager is that everything looks
like a source; imagine building a visible-range camera that worked at
incandescent temperatures.

Germanium is nice, if you can get it.
Polythene just about works, if you use a frensel lens.
(see the hundreds of millions of them deployed worldwide)

I was thinking more of a close-packed array of PIR sensors. For exmaple
a zigzag line of sensors like

o o o o
o o o o

with a mechanical device to scan it.

I wonder if a silicon window would work.
0.3mm silicon is widely available.

A stainless parabolic mirror ...


0.
 
R

Rene Tschaggelar

Ian said:
Germanium is nice, if you can get it.
Polythene just about works, if you use a frensel lens.
(see the hundreds of millions of them deployed worldwide)

I was thinking more of a close-packed array of PIR sensors. For exmaple
a zigzag line of sensors like

o o o o
o o o o

with a mechanical device to scan it.

thinkable. Thermopiles are also thinkable.
I wonder if a silicon window would work.
0.3mm silicon is widely available.

Germanium is used as IR window because it is transparent there.
Silicon appears not to be transparent, as there are no silicon
windows available.
A stainless parabolic mirror ...

The mirror would have to be held a a very low temperature
to be part of the image.

Rene
 
Top