S
Spehro Pefhany
So add 1 liter distelled.
![]()
Have you considered a career in homeopathy?
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
So add 1 liter distelled.
![]()
So add 1 liter distelled.
Set up a another company. You do the IR work under that company. They
pay you some consulting fees. Your new company rents your lab and
equipment from your current company to keep all the paper work legit.
You have not exported anything yet. Then sell the company to the
client. You are not exporting, you sold the company.
Let them deal with it. I dont know if this would qualify under ITAR
but it might be another way.
Ordinarily I'd agree with you, but many of these unreasonable export laws only exist because technically-qualified people failed to "get political."
-- john
Hey ricksha, you can leave if you like.
You are a bit of a newbee here, this is a politronics group you know.
Phil Hobbs said:I've got lots to do--right now I'm making an interferometric detector
for hypersonic, sub-micron particles,
Say... that was some semiconductor related process thing, wasn't it?
Wouldn't that be in vacuum, where the speed of sound is a dubious measure?
Tim
Putting yourself on the Radar or not can have far-reaching risk/consequences.
http://www.cistec.or.jp/english/service/report/0802ITARarticleforCISTEC.pdf
Hello,
it is not unlogical, Hudson River water is polluted, any water
discharged into the Hudson River should be cleaner than the water
already in it.
Don't be ridiculous. The river would be no worse for the action and
it would have saved a few hundred thousand gallons of potable water
and the state many thousands of dollars.
Actually not. It's in a moderately low pressure gas, but an 0.2 um
particle going Mach 9 (3 km/s) can travel ~10 cm before slowing down
much. (That's a few hundred thousand gees' worth of drag.)
So any polluter who dumps waste into a river is ok as long as the waste
isn't actually *worse* than the river?
You are making a distinction
based on the idea that he is just returning the same water back to the
river. But to anyone with a critical eye, he is drawing water, using it
for an industrial purpose and when he wants to dump it into the river is
required to meet pollution requirements.
What is wrong with that exactly?
Are you sure that's safe? I'm not.
Cheers,
James Arthur
(posted with a Droid tablet, as an experiment.)
What's safe? You sound like Marathon Man.![]()
Publish it here![]()
Back in the late 80s or early 90s the USG tried to put the freeze on
journals, and tried preventing some foreign nationals from attending
conferences in the US. That was a great boon to the European conference
hosts.
There was a big court case, I forget which one, where this was tested,
and the ruling was that unless the govt articulated a compelling and
specific national security interest, or decided to classify your work,
you could publish what you liked.
Since then there's been much less interference. In any case, the
interference happened at the journal level more than the author level.
In any case, my particular work is aimed at making poor-quality infrared
pixels somewhat better, rather than building the best of the best.
paranoid much, MM?
If you perpetrate a compromise, 'they' *will* find you.