My main point (not clearly enunciated) was that a higher ripple current rating is better (not worse) when all other things are equal.
Before you read any further, the rest of this post (almost 100% guaranteed) does NOT apply in your situation. Follow Kris's advice.
Ripple current applies at all frequencies. See
here where it s discussed for tantalum capacitors at frequencies from 100Hz to 100kHz.
The important thing to consider is that the ripple current rating is dependant on frequency (and not in a simple way either). It is an I²R (i.e. heating) issue, and the frequency dependence comes from the fact that the R is the ESR of the capacitor and that is frequency dependant (in a likewise non-simple way).
Ad Kris says, it's generally not an issue at low frequencies, but this is because the ESR is much lower (leading to a higher permissible ripple current), not because ripple current per se is not an issue.
This means you have to read the specs very carefully *if* it is an issue.
(I think I need to do a resource on reading specs. There's so much that is well hidden in even the most clearly stated specifications if you don't know *exactly* what they mean or under what conditions they apply.)
Here is another article showing how different assumptions can give very different ripple current ratings for the same capacitor.
Even determining the ripple current can be tricky.
Here and
here are examples of manufacturers trying to make the selection of the correct capacitor an easy process

D). Note that ripple current is just one aspect.
You might notice that I find this stuff fascinating.