J
Jan Panteltje
Jan Panteltje wrote:
And against Germans, too?
Wasn't it at the times of Pompidou ?
SECAM was entirely bought by the USSR, including the schematics and the
valves for the TV sets. NTSC was considered also (that was during the
warming in relations of USSR and US (Sojuz - Apollo and such) ; SECAM
was preferred for the number of technical and political reasons.
SECAM can tolerate the poor quality channels, NTSC can't. The tuning
tolerances are much wider with SECAM, the delay lines do not have to be
very accurate. That used to be very important considerations at that
time. Phase distortions kill the NTSC. However in ideal conditions the
NTSC picture quality is better.
I can understand why the robustness was critical to Russians, but why
French did bother about at first time?
It had to be different from NTSC, and PAL did not exist yet.
Yet SECAM was horrible on a BW set (bad BW compatibility), later BW sets
had a special filter to get rid of the subcarrier that caused all sorts
of bad patterns on colored edges.