davenn
Moderator
From unpleasant experience on a few other discussion boards, I've come to dislike all systems of assigning "rank" or "status" or "rating" to members, regardless of what they are based on.
What I have seen is that they often promote disunity and conflict, as board members vie for status versus one another and engage in loud pissing matches over who is the "better" member or who has earned more awards. I've also seen it cause the formation of cliques of members who surreptitiously agree to always "like" or "agree with" one another's posts (even those which are mere banter) in order to boost their collective ranks versus those of other, similar cliques. It can get truly ridiculous. One board I participated in for a while eventually fell apart completely due to the incessant bickering caused by their over-elaborate rating system with its various medals, ribbons, awards, trophies and other assorted nonsense, and it got to the point where most of the discussion on the board was centered around member status rather than the core mission of the board. The serious people walked away in disgust at this juvenile wienie-wagging, and the board died.
well none of that has ever happened on the physics forum. maybe because none of it is actually displayed openly, rather one has to go looking for the results
I'm not sure if anyone else can see what my trophy points are for ? rather they may only be able to see the points total and only I can see what they are for ( well and site mentors)
Did you actually go and look at the link I provided and see how the points are assigned ?? may be not, by your comments
The points really are based on GOOD personal achievement it encourages a positive attitude in posting and promotion of the forum
Dave