J
John Perry
Have a look at abse. I found out how to get a pdf from Eagle
John Perry
John Perry
Have a look at abse. I found out how to get a pdf from Eagle
John Perry
Jim Thompson said:Standard PDF's show as "application/octet-stream"
"application/octet-stream" is a catch-all for "I don't know what this
is", and is generated by the web server, not the file itself.
PDFs *should* be application/pdf so that you can have your browser
open up the right kind of viewer.
Most web servers look at the filename suffix (.pdf) or the magic
numbers in the file to automatically determine the type of the file;
it has nothing to do with how the file is itself created (other than
to create a pdf vs some other type of file).
Jim Thompson said:I did a trial post of a PDF made by Acrobat v7. It shows (and opens)
as application/octet-stream in Agent.
Hmmm... when a file is attached to a mail or posting, the user agent
doing the posting needs to do the same checks a web server would do -
look at the suffix and/or magic numbers and determine a file type.
Any time you end up with application/octet-stream, it means whoever is
doing these checks doesn't know anything about the file in question,
which almost always means it's "wrong" if you intend for people to be
able to click on the file and have it automatically come up in the
right viewer.
Since application/octet-stream is the "I don't know" catch-all, if you
tell your reader/browser to use acroread to read such files, I could
post a chunk of pseudorandom numbers (which *should* be
application/octet-stream, since that's all it is - a stream of
octets), and you would try to view it in acroread. That would be bad.
So it sounds like your Agent is misconfigured; it should post PDFs as
application/pdf and it should never try to automatically view files of
type application/octet-stream. Otherwise, next time someone with a
naive Agent tries to post a spreadsheet, you're going to have an
unhappy acroread on your hands.
You're right... makes no sense. I'm going to delete "octet-stream"
and see what happens.
...Jim Thompson
Jim said:
...Was that a simulation of my circuit? Thanks, if I'm understanding it
correctly. Apparently I should have kept your big (100uf?) capacitor.
I guess you found a model for the AD8551? Looks like it really did go
rail-to-rail. If I'm completely off the wall, please be kind .
I wish the bastards at hp would get my replacement hard drive to me so I
can run my own simulations and such. They've been jerking me around now
for over a month. I would've bought a drive, only they keep giving me a
sure shipping date. I'd rather hear a truthful "we can't yet" than a
"september 15th" lie. I really like my hp printers, and thought I was
in good shape with this damn Pavilion laptop.
jp
Jim said:I bought an hp computer ONCE. Never again. Printers and scanners
ONLY.
I suspect it happened when I tried to install Acrobat v7 and still
keep Acrobat v4. Had so many quirks I had to move Acrobat v4 to
another machine.
There are times when I could "go postal" at Adobe headquarters ;-)
...Jim Thompson
We will not even get started on the Macrovision and registration
nightmares with the Adobe flagship products.
I will be ordering the specified CT for this project ASAP. In the
meantime I am going to hack a Xformer off of a modem or something in an
attempt to breadboard the project to garner a better understanding of
the circuit in a working state.
Question: Is it feasable to use a small pot in place of the resistor
that grounds the Rectifier (or a pot and Resistor in parallel for
safety). In my mind that would allow fine tuning of the CTs output
scale to match the A/Ds full scale voltage.
Your latest schematic cmon2.jpg has some errors, and is also way moreBack to logging current via a CT hooked to an A/D
I will be ordering the specified CT for this project ASAP. In the
meantime I am going to hack a Xformer off of a modem or something in an
attempt to breadboard the project to garner a better understanding of
the circuit in a working state.
Question: Is it feasable to use a small pot in place of the resistor
that grounds the Rectifier (or a pot and Resistor in parallel for
safety). In my mind that would allow fine tuning of the CTs output
scale to match the A/Ds full scale voltage.
Question: Is it feasable to use a small pot in place of the resistor
that grounds the Rectifier (or a pot and Resistor in parallel for
safety). In my mind that would allow fine tuning of the CTs output
scale to match the A/Ds full scale voltage.
Do you have some references you can point me to?
Hello Jim,
The most concise outline for someone who is new to these filters (and
doesn't speak German) seems to be this nice introduction:
http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Wave_Digital_Filters.html
WDF's have been presented by Prof.Fettweis and not all stuff was written
in English. But I do have quite some material. So if you need more let
me know and I'll email. Best may be to email me because my NG computer
made some signs this morning that it may be about to croak.
Was out yesterday. Perspectives 2006 in Sacramento, moderated by Tom
Sullivan. But the best were the speakers. Bob Dole, Tom Ridge, Tom
Daschle, Soledad O'Brien, Dave Barry, Roy Firestone. This means I'll
have to work today but it was absolutely worth it.
Hello Jim,
The most concise outline for someone who is new to these filters (and
doesn't speak German) seems to be this nice introduction:
http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Wave_Digital_Filters.html
Question: Is it feasable to use a small pot in place of the resistor
that grounds the Rectifier (or a pot and Resistor in parallel for
safety). In my mind that would allow fine tuning of the CTs output
scale to match the A/Ds full scale voltage.
Your latest schematic cmon2.jpg has some errors, and is also way more
complex than needed. Also, I don't think you need to worry too much about
these little CTs bursting into flame or exploding if the secondary is open
circuited, but it is always wise to use precautions.
Paul said:[snip good heads-up about Adobe and HP]Your latest schematic cmon2.jpg has some errors, and is also way moreBack to logging current via a CT hooked to an A/D
I will be ordering the specified CT for this project ASAP. In the
meantime I am going to hack a Xformer off of a modem or something in an
attempt to breadboard the project to garner a better understanding of
the circuit in a working state.
Question: Is it feasable to use a small pot in place of the resistor
that grounds the Rectifier (or a pot and Resistor in parallel for
safety). In my mind that would allow fine tuning of the CTs output
scale to match the A/Ds full scale voltage.
complex than needed. Also, I don't think you need to worry too much about
these little CTs bursting into flame or exploding if the secondary is open
circuited, but it is always wise to use precautions. A true current source
would generate an output voltage high enough to arc across the terminals or
break down internal insulation, but these small CTs will just saturate and
put out at most maybe a hundred volts. If there are high frequency
components involved, it could be much higher, however.
I'll try to draw a suggested simple schematic that should work:
+-----+
AC-----)|(----|~ +|--+---R2---+----+----AD1
)|( | | | | |
)|( | BR1 | R1 C1 Z1
)|( | | | | |
AC-----)|(----|~ -|--+--------+----+----GND
T1 +-----+
I would suggest R1 about 200 ohms to get about 3 VDC at 10 AAC input. R2
can be about 10K, C1 about 5 uF, and Z1 a 4.7 V zener. You could put a pot
across R1 to make it adjustable, but you can also do that in software.
For best accuracy, however, I still suggest doing the rectification with an
absolute value routine in software, and eliminate the bridge rectifier.
Here's that circuit:
+----R3----> Vcc
|
AC-----)|(-----+---R2---+----+----AD1
)|( | | |
)|( R1 C1 Z1
)|( | | |
AC-----)|(-----+--------+----+----GND
T1
R1 should be about 150 ohms to get about 4 volts P-P at 10 amps input. R2
and R3 should be about 2K, and C1 should be about 0.1 uF. The input to AD1
will be just about 2.5 VDC with an AC signal varying from about 1 V to 4 V,
which is easily sampled by the A/D at about 300/sec. This should be done in
an interrupt service routine (ISR) using a microcontroller's programmable
resettable timer (PRT). You should read, accumulate and store the A/D at
the start of the routine, and then start the next conversion. When you have
accumulated a certain number of readings, send it out the serial port or
whatever you will use to display it.
Breadboard the above circuits and measure values to fine tune the resistors
and capacitors for best results, and to become familiar with how this
works. Use a scope for better visualization. You can worry about the
details of the A/D later.
Paul