C
Chris Carlen
Hi:
I got a roll of Kester SAC305 alloy 0.031" no-clean flux cored wire
solder. Tested it out by soldering a DIP and some wires to a PCB and
also by tinning some wire. The tinning went a lot smoother (wetted
slightly under the skin, not just the tip near the iron) when some
additional rosin flux liquid was applied. Without that, such as with
the PCB, the solder definitely doesn't wet and flow like SnPb. It
works, but doesn't give a very satisfying "feel." And is also harder to
control how much to feed into a joint, since you don't know if it is in
the mood to soak through or not on any particular attempt. Ultimately
if I had to, I could get the hang of it.
I am curious to see what will come down the pike at my job, where it is
likely that soon we will be banned from soldering (actually using any
chemicals) in our work areas.
The point is that technician work areas are also used for eating, as we
don't have separate offices and labs like scientists. But if we can't
work with chemicals in our work areas, that sure cuts down on the amount
of work we can do.
The next question is whether there will eventually be a push toward
eliminating Pb based solders in the soldering that we have to do.
I spent some time at aimsolder.com today, looking at their CASTIN alloy,
which contains a little bit of antimony. Says it wets better than
SAC305 and higher Ag containing alloys. Apparently <=2.5% Ag is better
for wetting. I hope that alloy works a little easier.
Which leads to my question of the day:
If the automated assembly industry will definitely move to lead-free,
what about all the hand soldering that is still done? It seems it is
easier to get automated processes to work well with these solders, but
hand soldering will just never be the same. Is the EU banning only
commercial products from Pb solder processes, or will lead solder be
simply unavailable, such as to hobbyists and engineers doing R&D work?
Good day!
I got a roll of Kester SAC305 alloy 0.031" no-clean flux cored wire
solder. Tested it out by soldering a DIP and some wires to a PCB and
also by tinning some wire. The tinning went a lot smoother (wetted
slightly under the skin, not just the tip near the iron) when some
additional rosin flux liquid was applied. Without that, such as with
the PCB, the solder definitely doesn't wet and flow like SnPb. It
works, but doesn't give a very satisfying "feel." And is also harder to
control how much to feed into a joint, since you don't know if it is in
the mood to soak through or not on any particular attempt. Ultimately
if I had to, I could get the hang of it.
I am curious to see what will come down the pike at my job, where it is
likely that soon we will be banned from soldering (actually using any
chemicals) in our work areas.
The point is that technician work areas are also used for eating, as we
don't have separate offices and labs like scientists. But if we can't
work with chemicals in our work areas, that sure cuts down on the amount
of work we can do.
The next question is whether there will eventually be a push toward
eliminating Pb based solders in the soldering that we have to do.
I spent some time at aimsolder.com today, looking at their CASTIN alloy,
which contains a little bit of antimony. Says it wets better than
SAC305 and higher Ag containing alloys. Apparently <=2.5% Ag is better
for wetting. I hope that alloy works a little easier.
Which leads to my question of the day:
If the automated assembly industry will definitely move to lead-free,
what about all the hand soldering that is still done? It seems it is
easier to get automated processes to work well with these solders, but
hand soldering will just never be the same. Is the EU banning only
commercial products from Pb solder processes, or will lead solder be
simply unavailable, such as to hobbyists and engineers doing R&D work?
Good day!