Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Effects of gaps in inductors and transformers

J

joseph2k

MassiveProng said:
**** you and your beliefs. I don't need to respond to your petty
baby bullshit at all. Nor do I need to measure up to your petty baby
bullshit assessments, dipshit.

So **** off, jack-off.

Describing yourself again potty mouth?
 
J

John Larkin

Why are you three twits jacking each other off in my electronics
group?


Your group? You're about as outsider as outside gets. By choice,
apparently.

John
 
M

MassiveProng

Nah, it's because he's 3.

And the beat goes on...

When are you pussy fucktards going to stop beating each other off in
my electronics groups?
 
M

MassiveProng

is that age or IQ ?

For age multiply your retarded figure by 1.5 orders of magnitude.
For IQ, two orders of magnitude.

And the beat goes on...
 
T

Tony Williams

Hersham, next to the sewage works?

Near Walton on Thames station afair.

Strange. I used to do the long commute from Hampstead
to Decca every day, and then back again. I didn't
have a clue what Walton was like.
 
T

Tony Williams

Bill Sloman said:
I'm not impressed. I don't trust any article on transformers that
doesn't include the transformer equations
V1= L1. dI1/dt + M. d I2/dt
V2= M. dI1/dt + L2. d I2/dt
Modelling a transformer as an "ideal" transformer plus leakage
inductances doesn't give the same insight, and it certainly
doesn't give you the right insight.

I think I disagree with you there Bill. Look at the
similar thread running here on leakage inductance.
The equivalent circuit developed to include winding
resistances produced exactly the same final sums for
Rpri and Lpri as the textbook sums that started off
from mutual inductance. In fact that was the check
that the equivalent circuit was correct.

I prefer an equivalent circuit because it allows an
intuitive view of which of the various transformer
imperfections are going to matter most in the
particular application.
 
Top