-
Categories
-
Platforms
-
Content
You need to describe what these electrodes are, where they're placed, and the signal you're expecting. (if you know)
Please take a look here : http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~valvano/Datasheets/AD620.pdfThe electrodes are used to read signals from the brain off the scalp. In the circuit they're placed at pins 2 and 3 on the instrumentation amplifier AD620AN, and for input signal they're placed on the scalp. I unfortunately do not know what value of signal to expect or how to test it on which pins/outputs/etc.
Please take a look here : http://users.ece.utexas.edu/~valvano/Datasheets/AD620.pdf
The AD620 is an amplifier, and it's not a 'dual input' amplifier.. it's a differential amplifier.
What this means is that it is meant to amplify the 'Difference' in signal between the two probes.
You need to know the proper placement of these probes. You also need an oscilloscope that you can use to probe the inputs and outputs of each stage of your design.
I'm sure you've noticed the number of op-amps in the design... they are not all used for amplification... the remainder of the circuit is active filters. They are meant to condition the signal by stripping away noise and other frequencies that you are not interested in.
If you don't have an output... this could mean that the two probes are getting the same signal, (hence no difference to amplify) or that any one of the additional op-amp stages have been incorrectly wired or designed.
To fix it, you need the proper tools to analyse it. To build it, you should have a good understanding of how each stage works.
You are looking for a low frequency signal, I'm sure a USB one would be fine... what you want is sensitivity... the voltages present on the input of AD620 will be tiny. After the AD620, the levels will be easy to measure.Thank you so much for your help and patience. I really appreciate it! I'll be going through and checking everything tomorrow.
One more question though: will I need a physical oscilloscope or would a virtual computer one suffice? I'm sure a physical one would be better especially if the sound card is cutting out the signals, so I'll scavenge for one if need be, but I just wanted to check.
From what I read, EEG signals are ~100uV in amplitude, so with a gain of 89 you should ideally expect only ~9mV output from the 620.I'm not sure what I'm supposed to get through its output
I decided to look at the instructable to find out what is expected...
The original designer claims the first and last stage are 60Hz 'Notch Filters' to get rid of 60Hz.
The second stage is a 'High Pass' filter and the 3rd stage is a 'Low Pass' filter... it does not look right to me... in addition to the 'filters' being incorrect, the last 'filter' isn't even wired correctly... the sound card gets connected @ the intersection of the 3rd stage output and 4th stage input.
Comments consist of people basically saying 'cool' or 'I can't get it to work' .
You have the basic idea of how this should work... I highly suggest you take apart the WHOLE darn thing. Delete the bookmark you have for instructables and build one yourself from scratch.
Use the instrumentation OPamp (AD620)
Then make your own filters. You know the frequencies you want, and I linked Low-Pass / High-Pass resources for you already.
I think you should hang onto the parts and build your own EEG in stages. You should be able to use the parts you have, but may need replacement resistors or capacitors. I can't tell you which right now, but you can figure it out with a little time.Do you think I'll be able to create a new circuit, but using the same parts? My issue is that I'm supposed to make this circuit three times over, so I have the parts available for three circuits from this schematic. These are the only parts I have available, and I'd prefer to avoid purchasing more parts if I can. If push comes to shove I will, however.
I did find this: https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-26522 . The author uses the same Instructables circuit, but modifies it and gets it to work using a majority of the same parts. Do you think this is better, or should I move on with scrapping the Instructable completely?
Build Order...
Start with the 620, then ignore everything in-between and build an amplifier. You should be able to use your sound-card to view the noisy signal at this point.
Disconnect the line from the 620's output and amplifier input... build a Low-Pass or High-Pass filter (At 31Hz or 7Hz respectively) and stick it inbetween the 620 and amplifier. You should be able to see a noisy signal at this point as well, but frequencies above or below your cut-off should be much less noticeable.
Repeat the process with the other complementary filter... if you built a Low-Pass, it's time to build the High-Pass. This can be stuck in-between the 620 and your first filter, or after the first filter and the amplifier. Again, connect to the sound card and take a look at results.
The 'Notch filter' is only required to remove 50Hz or 60Hz hum that is picked up from power-lines inside and outside your home... think of it like the City's EEG xD The Notch filter placement would be right before the amplifier after your first two filters. (Your Low-Pass filter should attenuate this a considerable amount anyway... but the breadboard or circuit board may pick it up again... so try to keep the wire from the Notch-Filter's output to the amplifier as short as possible.
At this point, you have followed the template from Instructables, but have ensured that your filters are set to the proper values, and most importantly, you have tested it from start to finish, so if you get no output, you have a better idea of where it went wrong!
Although... as mentioned previously, the PC input may have a built-in high-pass filter, so it may be a good idea to test this before you attempt to use it with your home-made EEG. Additionally you should be careful to limit the output so you don't fry your sound card. Measure for DC voltage first before making the connection. Should be 0V!
Please build the circuit with 9-V batteries as recommended, and if possible, make a 'fake' brain you can connect the circuit to.
You could copy a recorded EEG signal or make one with Audacity and slap it on an MP3 player (confirm the output with your sound card to make sure it playes...) then take the output from the MP3 player and send the signal through a voltage divider... This will reduce the signal to a fraction of a mV which you can practice the circuit with.
You know have a known input, and an expected output. As long as the MP3 player and PC sound-card can play-back and record 7-30Hz you should have all the tools you need.
Build order will vary slightly... mainly because you will want to make sure the AD620 and the final amplifier works. The AD620 and Amplifier are the first to be built and wired together without ANY filter between them. Then you can put the filters in-between. You can build the filters in any order you want. (If you record the input with something like Audacity, you can analyse the stream and plot the spectrum to see if it made a difference)So, the order should be: amplifier (ADN), notch filter, then my two filters (one low one high)? Is there any use for the potentiometer anymore (or is that up to my design)?
Also, for the "fake brain", would I use an audio cable and alligator clips to get the fake signal from an MP3 of 7Hz-30Hz to the circuit? And the voltage divider should output around the ~100uV range that was mentioned above?
The circuit should be:
AD620 > Band-Pass > Notch-Filter > Amplifier
You may need to play with this a little... the AD620 is going to amplify the 'difference' between the two pads ... that means if one of the pads or wires is picking up noise that the other isnt... you will also amplify that noise. You do want this signal to be as strong as you can get it though. I would certainly be aiming for high mV range at the very least personally.Alright, so I've come up with this in terms of basic schematic layout/format. Working on the calculations, but I wanted to check and make sure this was correct before moving too far ahead.
The op-amp filters are all from the websites you mentioned.
Alpha and beta wave amplitudes are around 20-60 microvolts and 10-20 microvolts, respectively. Should I be trying to use the AD260 to get them into millivolt or volt range?
You may need to play with this a little... the AD620 is going to amplify the 'difference' between the two pads ... that means if one of the pads or wires is picking up noise that the other isnt... you will also amplify that noise.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that even though EEGs employ differential inputs the leads should still be high grade, exceptionally flexible shielded cables. The shields should be tied to circuit GND at the 620 end of the cables.
What are the corner frequencies of the two filters before it?
ak
My concern is the part #s of the opamps. Certain parts have certain limitations, and to be blunt. I simply don't know the 'ideal' voltage that you should try to bump the signal out of the AD620 in order to filter the results.
If it helps, I bought ALPTA brand passive gold plated copper EEG electrodes from Ebay. I bought touchproof adapters from PlasticsOne, and soldered the ends of the adapters to male jumper cables so they fit in my board at pins 2 and 3 of the AD260, and one into the ground power line of my circuit as a reference electrode.
I didn't ground the electrodes at pins 2 and 3 however.