Nope, still getting the same message.
I'm approximately half way between Beijing and the Ronne ice shelf.
I find that search engines differ greatly in their utility. In my experience Google is more consistently reliable in finding datasheets (and I look for them a LOT)
Now you have the English version of the datasheet which gives you a sample circuit and the formula for calculating the delays, have you identified the resistor(s) and capacitor involved? Can you calculate what the delay should be based on their values? Does it match what you're seeing?
If the capacitor is large in value, and especially if the resistor is also large, the delay may be significantly larger due to leakage and input currents. The times you are reporting are pretty long for a simple RC delay.
Regardless of all that, if you have correctly identified the chip then it should be a simple case of locating and replacing the correct resistor and/or capacitor.
I'm approximately half way between Beijing and the Ronne ice shelf.
I find that search engines differ greatly in their utility. In my experience Google is more consistently reliable in finding datasheets (and I look for them a LOT)
Now you have the English version of the datasheet which gives you a sample circuit and the formula for calculating the delays, have you identified the resistor(s) and capacitor involved? Can you calculate what the delay should be based on their values? Does it match what you're seeing?
If the capacitor is large in value, and especially if the resistor is also large, the delay may be significantly larger due to leakage and input currents. The times you are reporting are pretty long for a simple RC delay.
Regardless of all that, if you have correctly identified the chip then it should be a simple case of locating and replacing the correct resistor and/or capacitor.