S
SG1
Rod has AIDSTrevor said:
Aquired Itelligence Deficency Syndrome.
-
Categories
-
Platforms
-
Content
Aquired Itelligence Deficency Syndrome.
T
Trevor
SG1 said:
Are you sure he aquired it and was not just born that way?
Trevor.
T
Trevor Wilson
**I'd reserve that for the person who cannot manage to spell acquired
correctly.
T
Trevor Wilson
**Oh and intelligence.
Sheesh. Talk about living in glass houses.
Y
yaputya
Trevor Wilson said:
You missed deficiency.
1 out of 4 ain't bad, I guess.
S
SG1
yaputya said:
Sorry Maths & Science were my strong points in school which I left 50 years
ago
T
Trevor Wilson
****** me. So many spelling mistakes. I was overwhelmed.
D
Damian
Just another pig ignorant lie.Rod Speed said:
Just another pig ignorant lie.
Just another pig ignorant lie.
Just another pig ignorant lie.
Just another pig ignorant lie.
Just another pig ignorant lie.
D
Damian
Rod Speed said:
I quote again, your comment says, "UV doesn't get through glass".
Dead incorrect.
Not specifically about cfls.
D
Damian
" >>>>>
Your problem too, 'cos of your silly claim about cfls not emitting UV.
Read and learn.
According to the European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and
Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) in 2008, CFLs may pose an added
health risk due to the ultraviolet and blue light emitted. This radiation
could aggravate symptoms in people who already suffer skin conditions that
make them exceptionally sensitive to light. The light produced by some
single-envelope CFLs at distances of less than 20 cm could lead to
ultraviolet exposures approaching the current workplace limit set to protect
workers from skin and retinal damage. Industry sources claim the UV
radiation received from CFLs is too small to contribute to skin cancer and
the use of double-envelope CFLs "largely or entirely" mitigates any other
risks.[63]
A 2012 study comparing cellular health effects of CFL light and incandescent
light found statistically significant cell damage in cultures exposed to CFL
light. Spectroscopic analysis confirmed the presence of significant UVA and
UVC radiation, which the study's authors conjectured was attributable to
damage in the bulbs' internal phosphor coatings. No cellular damage was
observed following exposure to incandescent light of equivalent intensity.
The study's authors suggest that the ultraviolet exposure could be limited
by the use of "double-walled" bulbs manufactured with an additional glass
covering surrounding the phosphor-coated layer.[6
I'm 100% right about that.
Physics isn't your domain, neither is biology.
But Wikipedia is free, as you may already know.
Your problem too, 'cos of your silly claim about cfls not emitting UV.
Read and learn.
According to the European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and
Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) in 2008, CFLs may pose an added
health risk due to the ultraviolet and blue light emitted. This radiation
could aggravate symptoms in people who already suffer skin conditions that
make them exceptionally sensitive to light. The light produced by some
single-envelope CFLs at distances of less than 20 cm could lead to
ultraviolet exposures approaching the current workplace limit set to protect
workers from skin and retinal damage. Industry sources claim the UV
radiation received from CFLs is too small to contribute to skin cancer and
the use of double-envelope CFLs "largely or entirely" mitigates any other
risks.[63]
A 2012 study comparing cellular health effects of CFL light and incandescent
light found statistically significant cell damage in cultures exposed to CFL
light. Spectroscopic analysis confirmed the presence of significant UVA and
UVC radiation, which the study's authors conjectured was attributable to
damage in the bulbs' internal phosphor coatings. No cellular damage was
observed following exposure to incandescent light of equivalent intensity.
The study's authors suggest that the ultraviolet exposure could be limited
by the use of "double-walled" bulbs manufactured with an additional glass
covering surrounding the phosphor-coated layer.[6
I'm 100% right about that.
Physics isn't your domain, neither is biology.
But Wikipedia is free, as you may already know.
S
SG1
Damian said:
My everyday spectacles have a coating to deter UV. So optical glass alows UV
to pass.
D
Damian
Rod Speed said:
There is no such thing as LNP either.
But, they do insist they exist.
D
Damian
I checked the other day. They are still around man.Rod Speed said:
You need to get extra strength lenses on your specs.
You've been rubbing the glasses on something or something.
D
Damian
Rod Speed said:
I order you to prepare the doll under the bed by patching up any holes, for
your trip to south pole next week.
No companion cats or dogs for you, as you may end up eating them.
)Keep dreamin my man....you may hit with a shocker...just wait.
D
Damian
Frank Slootweg said:
Yeah, that makes sense. Roddles gota be around 200 years old according to
history reports. ;-)
S
SG1
LNP exists as a political party in Qld.
R
Rod Speed
SG1 said:
Not a fucking clue, as always.
S
SG1
Rod Speed said:
I trust opto more than I could throw you.
T
Trevor
Trevor Wilson said:
Are you really sticking up for Rod? I guess he'll be pleased there is one at
least
Trevor.
T
Trevor
Damian said:
And a full glass light fitting will do the same job, including the $10
batten fix frosted glass balls. I suggest you buy some of those and stop
worrying.
Trevor.
Similar threads
