Still awaiting a reply on this one that ACTUALLY address's your crappy
grammer.
What?
It is GRAMMAR, you retarded TWIT! Also, it is ADDRESSES.
You are so quick to correct spelling and grammer, a rude move in
the ng's,
No, it isn't. It is only considered rude by the lame fucks that
refuse to discipline themselves.
I say: Firing Squad!
but your own lousy spelling and grammer are at question
here....
Not really. My spelling errors can be typos or spell checker
****-ups, but are not usually due to me, because, unlike you, I
remembered my education, and was paying attention when I received it.
As far as grammar goes, if you can't even spell it, I hardly think
you can be thought of as credible when critiquing it. Which you
didn't do. YOU merely spouted that it was "lousy" and "crappy".
You'll have to do better than that, and this time google won't help
your lame ass.
but what do you have to say....NO REPLY!
No. I said that I would not reply to your lame request that I
declare your age.
You REALLY need to read the posts (in your case, a few times) BEFORE
you reply, dipshit. You **** it up almost more often than the Keith
Tard does, and that is pretty fucking bad.
You just keep up the same old tired rehtoric. Baby bullshit, retard, usenet
twit and so on and so on.....
But... but... that IS what you ARE! I only state the facts. Your
Usenet behavior proves it!
Compared to your lame ass... indeed so. My pinky finger tip has
more class than you or your entire family ancestry does, Mac Tard.
So hey, why isn't your old buddy "Mr. Davidson / Floyd
the Bear Humper not trying to bail your sorry ass out?
As I told you before... that was not what he did, nor was it his
intention. In fact, if you ask him, he'll probably tell you that he
doesn't care much for me either.
What Floyd does, here in Usenet, more often than anyone I have ever
seen, is make concise, accurate posts. He wouldn't even do it, if it
wasn't correct. Dig?
He and I have gone around before. I have the utmost respect for
him, and he is one of the most intelligent engineers in this group.
Mainly because he ignores retards like you.
The ONLY reason he chimed in on this thread is because there were
things being stated by others that were simply untrue.
Perhaps one day, you'll actually go back, and re-read (if you can)
the actual posts, finding that he wasn't backing me up. The whole
time, all he was doing is informing folks of the truth about Usenet.
Well, he is busy with
a cute Caribou tonight...
You're lucky that he isn't a vindictive man.
and can't be bothered with the likes of you!
You wouldn't know. I am sure that I have bothered him on more than
one occasion.
I'd like to think that your immature troll antics strike a lower
chord for him, however.
When you sober up, leave an answer that actually address's the post!
Learn to actually read, and you may one day actually get it.
The word for today is CHRONOLOGICAL.
Here's a nice analogy. You do know what that word means, right?
The Chinese
and Israeli customs of writing differently aren't examples of why you
should defy convention. Rather, they'd actually be examples of why
you shouldn't. Would you learn to write in Hebrew, only to then
insist that everyone write from the left to the right? No, I should
think not. That language has been built on the opposite method of
writing, and that is the method that should be honored, until such
time that necessity requires change.
To return to the original point, I do not think there is anything
about usenet posts that would make top-posting desirable. There is
no reason to change the top-to-bottom convention which has otherwise
served western language very well. I am open to changes in language
conventions as they are needed, but I think much more would have to
change for top-posting to be considered efficient.
That is a quote from alt.video.dvd by someone with an IQ above 35.
Usenet is not your friggin e-mail, dingledorf. If you claim to be
standard conformal, then fuckin' conform.
If you are one of those "rules are meant to be broken" twits, the
BONE UP or take a friggin hike, boy.
Now. Read it again. Top posting IS retarded.
Do you know what the word means even? Most of the twits TOFQU
(text over, full quote under) making them even MORE retarded.
When you INTERLOPE yourself into a forum, you should at least TRY to
respect the conventions of that forum. If not, you deserve whatever
chastising you get from the peers in said forum that DO follow the
conventions.
You don't just get to pick and choose, and sluff off the rest
because you are too goddamned lazy to scroll to the interspersed
replies to the post, which is where the NEW material should be found.
Nearly ALL Usenet news clients have the ability built in to tag
quoted text, AND to highlight said tagged text in posts being read.
Spend a bit of time figuring out why, and you'll know how to post...
maybe.
