I read in sci.electronics.design that Guy Macon <http@?.guymacon.com/>
Xenon lamps and halogen lamps are not at all the same thing. Xenon is a
dense inert gas, which allows a higher filament temperature to be
achieved without excessive evaporation of the filament. Halogens are
highly reactive elements, and in a tungsten lamp set up a transport
mechanism whereby filament atoms that escape from the bulk filament are
returned to it.
As it turns out, probably not all that much difference... Many xenon
incandescent lamps are also halogen.
The gas fill in a halogen lamp is an inert gas - argon, krypton, or
xenon - and the halogen content is only some really small percentage.
As for life extension by reducing the inrush current:
Although it is common and obvious that incandescent lamps often, even
usually die during the inrush, in most cases what happens is that an aging
filament has a thin spot that has a temperature overshoot during the
inrush. The filament becomes unable to survive the inrush before it
becomes unable to survive steady operation. And in most cases not by a
whole lot - a "thin spot" that melts during the inrush will usually be
running hotter than the rest of the filament during normal operation, and
will be evaporating more badly, and that situation will be accelerating at
a rate increasing worse than exponentially.
As for the inrush causing actual damage to a filament that is not aged
to the point of being killed outright by the inrush: What I have heard
has been mixed, but I believe in most lamps the inrush does not
significantly damage any that it does not kill outright.
One bit of data: Those NTC thermistors sold to stick onto the tip of
the base of a lightbulb have often been claimed to double the life of the
lightbulb. I once applied one and measured the voltage drop, and found
that the voltage aplied to the filament was reduced enough to increase the
life by about 50% even after the thermistor and the lightbulb had fully
warmed up. Gain of double over 1.5 times, if true, means that reducing
the inrush would only extend the life by a third in typical household use.
Keep in mind traffic signals...
One difference that probably applies to halogen lamps: There is a
mechanism where their filaments could develop thin spots whose temperature
is excessive only during the inrush. The ends of the filament, since they
are cooler than the rest of the filament, may get thinned by the halogen
cycle. Should there be any halogen lamps where this is an actual common
cause of failure, I expect they will have life significantly increased by
reducing inrushes.
I expect this to be more significant with halogens that are dimmed
slightly, since slightly dimming a halogen like doing so with a
non-halogen greatly slows down formation of thin spots caused by
evaporation.
- Don Klipstein (
[email protected])