Interesting stuff. I never knew they had any real off-grid networks; I'd
only ever heard of local generation supplying single dwellings. Shame
there doesn't seem to be much about all of this on the 'net.
Take out the 'old' and that probably still stands
cheers
Jules- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Edison went to great political lengths to discourage AC, even publicly
electrocuting animals to show how AC causes heart failure where the
equivalent DC voltage would not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topsy_(elephant)
As you know the very nature of DC required multiple grids and an
endless supply of local generating plants, all of which Edison wanted
to provide.
My relatives have a farm in central IL with a generating windmill,
this farm only got on the grid after WW2. In the 1930's windmill
manufacturers in the US were producing about 100,000 windmills a year
for farms that had no access to electrical grids. It used storage
batteries. Funny how the wind circle is now being repeated.
These farmers weren't on any off- grid network. Some had windchargers and
some may have had generators but many were still without electricity of any
sort. Windmills to pump water, kerosene lamps. and wood or coal for heating.
The co-operative effort was to get connected to the grid at a time when
there were few, if any, farms remote from towns that did have grid
connections. This meant building a local distribution system and the utility
providing the tie to the grid and operation of the system.
The first case was in a tightly connected Mennonite "colony" and later ones
were more general groups of farmers after the success of this one. In
general rural (and urban) population densities were (and still are) lower
than those in IL(about 1/10 the population in 5 times the area-admittedly
mostly concentrated in the lower half (prairie/parkland)of the province ).
