Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Which is the cheapest microcontroller or PIC available.

P

Paul Hovnanian P.E.

nikhilele said:
quantiy is low in few hundreds its not a high volume project
I would like to say that programming and development tools are one time
investment and that is done at start of project thats it.

So if you are considering a $0.60 per unit uP and the development tools
cost $1000, that adds from something like $2.00 up to $10.00 per unit.
The point I'm trying to make is that the cheap chip might cost more if
the tools are proprietary.
 
B

BobG

nikhilele said:
Thanks M.Randelzhofer thats it I was searching like these.
If some one knows such more controlles with less price like these the
suggesions are welcomed.
====================================
As long as everybody gets to pitch their favorite inexpensive micro,
why not look at the tiny avrs? Less than $1, 8 pin pack, free tools,
etc etc
 
N

nikhilele

BobG said:
====================================
As long as everybody gets to pitch their favorite inexpensive micro,
why not look at the tiny avrs? Less than $1, 8 pin pack, free tools,
etc etc

plz give us more details
 
N

nikhilele

I think tiny avrs and 430f2001 from ti are cheap development tools
 
M

mc

JeffM said:
nikhilele wrote [WITHOUT CONTEXT]:
quantiy is low in few hundreds...

You DO realize that this isn't Google Groups. Don't you?

This is USENET
--and because most people use a *newsreader* to access USENET,
THEY DON'T SEE WHAT YOU SEE.

How many people are really using line-at-a-time newsreaders any more? (On
teletypes and VT-100s?) I use Outlook Express for threaded newsreading, and
frankly, I find top-posting of replies easier to take in than
bottom-posting. It's a matter of having lived in the full-screen-editing
era for the past 20 years or more.

Notice that in order not to bother you, I bottom-posted here.
 
P

Pooh Bear

mc said:
How many people are really using line-at-a-time newsreaders any more? (On
teletypes and VT-100s?) I use Outlook Express for threaded newsreading, and
frankly, I find top-posting of replies easier to take in than
bottom-posting.

They're 'ok' for simple replies. Anything more makes then clumsy.

Graham
 
T

Tim Auton

mc said:
JeffM said:
nikhilele wrote [WITHOUT CONTEXT]:
quantiy is low in few hundreds...

You DO realize that this isn't Google Groups. Don't you?

This is USENET
--and because most people use a *newsreader* to access USENET,
THEY DON'T SEE WHAT YOU SEE.

How many people are really using line-at-a-time newsreaders any more?

That has nothing whatsoever to do with the need for quoting and
bottom-posting.


Tim
 
P

Paul Hovnanian P.E.

mc said:
[snip]

How many people are really using line-at-a-time newsreaders any more? (On
teletypes and VT-100s?) I use Outlook Express for threaded newsreading, and
frankly, I find top-posting of replies easier to take in than
bottom-posting. It's a matter of having lived in the full-screen-editing
era for the past 20 years or more.

Notice that in order not to bother you, I bottom-posted here.

A: Because its not the natural way people read text.

Q: Why is top posting bad?
 
N

nikhilele

BOBG actually i was asking for some ebook or tutorial type of link
 
B

BobG

nikhilele said:
actually i was asking for some ebook or tutorial type of link
===============================
If you choose an avr processor, avrbeginners.net has tutorial examples
 
N

nikhilele

I got 89c2051 in 0.7$
and in my city I was not able to get tinyavr
 
B

BobG

nikhilele said:
I got 89c2051 in 0.7$
and in my city I was not able to get tinyavr
==================================================
Well, you didn't ask us "What is the cheapest microprocessor in my
city?" did you? Does your city have a mail man that rides into town
every now and then?
 
N

nikhilele

Sorry BobG I just forget
but i can ask for the chip from other cities if i want they will post
that to my door steps

u are free to give names of cheapest controller whether they are easily
available or not.
 
Top