J
Jiaqi
I am designing a low current source (decades to hundreds of
microamps) and I found Burr-Brown's REF200 satisfying. I read BB's
application bulletin AB-061 "IMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATIONS OF CURRENT
SOURCES AND CURRENT RECEIVERS", in which Fig. 14 shows a programmable
current source consisting of two resistors, an REF200 and an external
op amp. It says in the text,
"Because compliance of the 100uA current source is 2.5V, the
current source, Figure 14, can only COMPLY WITHIN 2.5V OF THE NEGATIVE
RAIL-even if the op amp can go further."
This sentence is above my comprehension. I read the datasheet of
REF200 but cannot yet find any clue. As far as I know, the so-called
"voltage compliance" refers to the valid range of the load terminal
potential. It seems to me that the load terminal potential has to be at
least 2.5V HIGHER than the negative rail, which contradicts the
original text.
Any instruction or information is welcome.
microamps) and I found Burr-Brown's REF200 satisfying. I read BB's
application bulletin AB-061 "IMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATIONS OF CURRENT
SOURCES AND CURRENT RECEIVERS", in which Fig. 14 shows a programmable
current source consisting of two resistors, an REF200 and an external
op amp. It says in the text,
"Because compliance of the 100uA current source is 2.5V, the
current source, Figure 14, can only COMPLY WITHIN 2.5V OF THE NEGATIVE
RAIL-even if the op amp can go further."
This sentence is above my comprehension. I read the datasheet of
REF200 but cannot yet find any clue. As far as I know, the so-called
"voltage compliance" refers to the valid range of the load terminal
potential. It seems to me that the load terminal potential has to be at
least 2.5V HIGHER than the negative rail, which contradicts the
original text.
Any instruction or information is welcome.