Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Very hot hot zenerdiode in NAD T762

P

Peter Andersen

I have to NAD T762 on the table. Both with burned out (shorted) 5,1V
zenerdiodes (D718).



I have replaces them with a new 5W type instead of the original 2W.



But the diodes is getting extremely hot and I can't figure out if this is ok
(like the way it was designed). They are sitting directly in series with a
7812 from a 22V DC supply. The thought behind the design must bee to divide
the power loss between the zenerdiode and the 7812.

The amplifier is working, but I don't like those hot zeners!



Is there anybody out there that have worked on a NAD T762?



Peter
 
I have to NAD T762 on the table. Both with burned out (shorted) 5,1V
zenerdiodes (D718).

I have replaces them with a new 5W type instead of the original 2W.

But the diodes is getting extremely hot and I can't figure out if this is ok
(like the way it was designed). They are sitting directly in series with a
7812 from a 22V DC supply. The thought behind the design must bee to divide
the power loss between the zenerdiode and the 7812.

The amplifier is working, but I don't like those hot zeners!

Is there anybody out there that have worked on a NAD T762?

Peter

*Shorted* Zeners? Are you sure? Usually they fail open.

Betcha you have a shorted driver transistor, possibly even a shorted
output transistor. What other tests have you done?

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA
 
F

Franc Zabkar

I have to NAD T762 on the table. Both with burned out (shorted) 5,1V
zenerdiodes (D718).



I have replaces them with a new 5W type instead of the original 2W.



But the diodes is getting extremely hot and I can't figure out if this is ok
(like the way it was designed). They are sitting directly in series with a
7812 from a 22V DC supply. The thought behind the design must bee to divide
the power loss between the zenerdiode and the 7812.

If there is a series resistor, then I'd measure the voltage across it.
That should give you the current, which in turn should give you the
actual dissipation in the zener. A 5V1 zener dissipating 1W would be
passing 200mA. Any more than that and I'd be looking for a culprit.

- Franc Zabkar
 
J

Jamie

Peter said:
I have to NAD T762 on the table. Both with burned out (shorted) 5,1V
zenerdiodes (D718).



I have replaces them with a new 5W type instead of the original 2W.



But the diodes is getting extremely hot and I can't figure out if this is ok
(like the way it was designed). They are sitting directly in series with a
7812 from a 22V DC supply. The thought behind the design must bee to divide
the power loss between the zenerdiode and the 7812.

The amplifier is working, but I don't like those hot zeners!



Is there anybody out there that have worked on a NAD T762?



Peter
Well,
I have a theory..
If the Zener is in fact in series with the feed to the 7812
from the 22 volt source? May I suggest that maybe 22 volts isn't
the real voltage it should be? If this is the case, it would place
the zener in a high resistive state and it will get hot!..
The reason say this is because the 7812 (last time I checked) can
handle around 36 volts.
Since your Zener is 5.1 volts, that leaves 2 things in conclusion.

#1.
It really isn't being used in Series but in parallel with a feeder
resistor to be used as a reference! In which case, the feeder as
reduced in size of the load from the circuit has been removed!.

#2
The 5.1 volt zener was picked to bring the Vcc source voltage down
a bit with in the safe operating range.

I would be willing to bet that it's suppose to be more than 22 volts.
 
A

Arfa Daily

Jamie said:
Well,
I have a theory..
If the Zener is in fact in series with the feed to the 7812
from the 22 volt source? May I suggest that maybe 22 volts isn't
the real voltage it should be? If this is the case, it would place
the zener in a high resistive state and it will get hot!..
The reason say this is because the 7812 (last time I checked) can
handle around 36 volts.
Since your Zener is 5.1 volts, that leaves 2 things in conclusion.

#1.
It really isn't being used in Series but in parallel with a feeder
resistor to be used as a reference! In which case, the feeder as reduced
in size of the load from the circuit has been removed!.

#2
The 5.1 volt zener was picked to bring the Vcc source voltage down
a bit with in the safe operating range.

I would be willing to bet that it's suppose to be more than 22 volts.

Well I must say, Jamie, I am having some difficulty following those lines of
reasoning. If the nominal supply is 22v, and a 5v1 zener is glued in series
with that to the input of the 7812, that's going to leave around 17v on the
input to the reg. So why is that a problem in as much as you think that the
starting voltage should be higher than 22v ? I must confess that I don't
really see the point of reducing the input volts by 5 - either 17 or 22
seems like a perfectly valid amount to me, just that at 22v, the reg might
need a bit more heatsinking on it. However, on that point, if the original
zener was rated at 2 watts, then allowing for some margin and derating to
say 1.5 watts, that would allow for a maximum current of 1.5 / 5 or ~330mA,
so that would imply that the designer was not expecting more than this to be
drawn from his 7812, even though these, in their commonest form, are rated
to an amp. Now if that is the case, the 7812 is almost idling anyway with
17v on its input, so I really can't see it caring much, temperature -wise,
about having 22v on it rather than 17v.

However, something else just occured to me. The OP was taking about zeners
in the plural - two I think. So is that two zeners, in series with each
other, and then in series with the input to the reg ? If that is the case,
then the maths certainly doesn't stack up, as 10v will be lost across the
zeners, leaving only 12v on the input to the regulator, which clearly isn't
enough, as Jamie suggests might be the case.

As a matter of interest, as these zeners had apparently failed short
circuit, and we know that the 7812 can take up to 36v on its input, how did
the OP know that there was a problem, given that he says that the amp is
apparently working ok ?

Arfa
 
J

Jamie

Arfa said:
Well I must say, Jamie, I am having some difficulty following those lines of
reasoning. If the nominal supply is 22v, and a 5v1 zener is glued in series
with that to the input of the 7812, that's going to leave around 17v on the
input to the reg. So why is that a problem in as much as you think that the
starting voltage should be higher than 22v ? I must confess that I don't
really see the point of reducing the input volts by 5 - either 17 or 22
seems like a perfectly valid amount to me, just that at 22v, the reg might
need a bit more heatsinking on it. However, on that point, if the original
zener was rated at 2 watts, then allowing for some margin and derating to
say 1.5 watts, that would allow for a maximum current of 1.5 / 5 or ~330mA,
so that would imply that the designer was not expecting more than this to be
drawn from his 7812, even though these, in their commonest form, are rated
to an amp. Now if that is the case, the 7812 is almost idling anyway with
17v on its input, so I really can't see it caring much, temperature -wise,
about having 22v on it rather than 17v.

However, something else just occured to me. The OP was taking about zeners
in the plural - two I think. So is that two zeners, in series with each
other, and then in series with the input to the reg ? If that is the case,
then the maths certainly doesn't stack up, as 10v will be lost across the
zeners, leaving only 12v on the input to the regulator, which clearly isn't
enough, as Jamie suggests might be the case.

As a matter of interest, as these zeners had apparently failed short
circuit, and we know that the 7812 can take up to 36v on its input, how did
the OP know that there was a problem, given that he says that the amp is
apparently working ok ?

Arfa
Ok, I'll add to that. What if, there were filter caps that reduce the
ripple of the 22 volt source and the cap's were defective? This in turn
wouldn't give you a constant voltage and thus, your meter would not be
giving you the actual where it should be if working caps were in there.

So lets assume for the moment, 22 * 1.414 = 31.108;

Lets say we place a 5.1 in series, net results would be ~25 V
At this level, the zener's resistive path would be much lower
and thus, less heat dissipation. And ofcourse, bringing the input
voltage down a bit for the post regulator will help reduce the
dissipation.

Not knowing exactly what the device is.
May I suggest that it's a small device being operated via an incorrectly
supplied wall wart or a supply unit that has failed caps.

Just an analogy !

Ok, Bye fer now!
 
Well I must say, Jamie, I am having some difficulty following those lines of
reasoning. If the nominal supply is 22v, and a 5v1 zener is glued in series
with that to the input of the 7812, that's going to leave around 17v on the
input to the reg. So why is that a problem in as much as you think that
the starting voltage should be higher than 22v?

I thought he was suggesting that the starting voltage should be ~40V,
and that's why the zener is needed (to get below 36V). Since the amp
is working with 22V as the starting voltage, this doesn't seem likely.
However, something else just occured to me. The OP was taking about
zeners in the plural - two I think. So is that two zeners, in series with
each other, and then in series with the input to the reg?

As I read it, there are two amplifiers, and the diode at location D718
is the zener in question. Or is D718 a part number?

TM
 
P

Peter Andersen

I thought he was suggesting that the starting voltage should be ~40V,
and that's why the zener is needed (to get below 36V). Since the amp
is working with 22V as the starting voltage, this doesn't seem likely.


As I read it, there are two amplifiers, and the diode at location D718
is the zener in question. Or is D718 a part number?

That is the partnumber on the schematic (if there should be a NAD technichan
out there he would know..)

No, there is only ONE zener in series with the 7812. The supply is 22V. The
7812 can be driven with 22V directly, so I located the _shorted_ zener by
the smell :) In the other amp the zener is leaking with 300ohm in both
directions.



I got a mail from someone that confirms the theory about the divided heat
dissipation. This 7812 is supplying the tuner and preoutboard (with digital
volumecontrol, a lot of opamps etc.)

The question is now: is there drawn to much current from this zener/7812
circuit or is it normal(bad bad design!). Who knows?



Peter
 
E

Eeyore

Arfa said:
Well I must say, Jamie, I am having some difficulty following those lines of
reasoning.

The guy is totally clueless about hardware design.

Graham
 
A

Arfa Daily

Eeyore said:
The guy is totally clueless about hardware design.

Graham
Wot, Jamie or me Graham ?? :)

Peter. As far as whether there is too much current being drawn, the absolute
maximum, which would take the original zener up to its 2 watt limit, is
400mA, which is obviously well within the capability of the 7812. However,
if I had been designing the thing, I wouldn't really want more than about
1.5 watts going west in that diode, (not that I would even have put it there
in the first place ...) so we're talking around 330mA. That would leave
around 4 watts or so in the 7812. Now that is basically nothing, especially
if a small heatsink is fitted, so I don't really see the point in having the
zener there to split the power dissipation. Maybe the 7812 is running
without a heatsink, and putting in a 2 cent zener was cheaper than a 3 cent
heatsink, but either way, unless we are missing something here, it seems
like a nonsense piece of design work to me.

I still don't really follow Jamies point about the zener being placed in a
"high resistive state". Once the zener 'knee' point on its curve has been
reached, that curve becomes pretty much vertical within a very small span of
reverse current. With the full rail current of 300mA or possibly more
passing through the one in this bit of kit, it should be in it's lowest
resistance fully on condition.

The point about a poor smoother, and excess ripple resulting in a low
average measured starting voltage is ok in principle, but if the cap was
really in that virtually open circuit condition, I would have expected to
have heard hum on the amp's outputs. The OP said that it was working ok.

I'm interested in the failures of these zeners, and how they were detected
by "smell". In the case of the one that had gone short, it can't have been
the diode itself that was smelling, as its dissipation must have dropped to
zero. That must mean that any power that was being 'lost' in it, was passed
on to the 7812 to lose, so was it this that was smelling to give the clue ?
If it was, then I am surprised, because if its dissipation had risen to the
point where it was smelling, I would have expected its SOA thermal foldback
to have kicked in. As for the zener that had gone 300 ohms (both ways)
leaky, it's hard to see how that circuit even carried on working, as all
voltage input for the 7812 would have disappeared across a 'resistor' of
this value placed in series with the regulator input, with just a few 10s of
mA being drawn.

It's all very curious. Given that the zeners have failed in normal service
in two cases, my inclination would be to short them out and let the regs
have the full 22v up 'em, and add a couple of heatsinks. Those circular
crinkly ones actually work very well, when the gap in the circle is forced
down over the devices's tab. I learnt that from a commercial board that I
repair, that has 3 TO220 Darlington motor driver transistors on it, heatsunk
in this way.

Arfa
 
T

Tim Schwartz

Peter said:
I have to NAD T762 on the table. Both with burned out (shorted) 5,1V
zenerdiodes (D718).



I have replaces them with a new 5W type instead of the original 2W.



But the diodes is getting extremely hot and I can't figure out if this is ok
(like the way it was designed). They are sitting directly in series with a
7812 from a 22V DC supply. The thought behind the design must bee to divide
the power loss between the zenerdiode and the 7812.

The amplifier is working, but I don't like those hot zeners!



Is there anybody out there that have worked on a NAD T762?



Peter
Peter (and others who have replied),

Unfortunately, some of these diodes do run hot. D716 is also doing the
same thing as D718 in the T762 for a different 12V regulator, so I'd see
how hot that diode (D716) is getting. Of course if the current load is
different on the regulator, the temperature may be different as well. I
don't have a T762 here to look at right now.

I would certainly agree with the other poster that the input capacitor
coming off the bridge rectifier (C704, 3300uf/35V) could be in trouble
and high ripple could cause problems. This can easily be scoped by
looking at the cathode end of either D718 or D716.

I have had problems on this series of NAD's with the bridge rectifier
diodes D701-704, especially if there is the brownish glue on them. They
often have horrible solder joints, and sometimes fail. I replace them
(originally they are 1N4004)with 1N5399 diodes which are rated for 1.5
amps. I also stand them off the board a bit for better cooling. If you
are running with only 3 of these diodes connected, you'll certainly have
higher ripple on the cap.

While you have the board out (lucky you) I'd also check D705-708 in the
same area and maybe replace them as well. Also check soldering in
general of the regulators. You don't want to have to keep removing the
board as it is rather time consuming and annoying.

Many owner's don't realize that surround sound receivers in general run
quite hot inside and need good air flow around them. I suggest at least
3 inches (8cm) of open air above the receiver if on an open shelf, and a
couple of inches (5cm) on either side and rear. The receiver should
also be on a hard surface, not carpet or such.

To other repliers: These supplies that we are discussing are low
voltage regulators for the input switching, digital board and front
panel, just about everything EXCEPT the power amps.

Regards,
Tim Schwartz
Bristol Electronics
 
That is the partnumber on the schematic (if there should be a NAD technichan
out there he would know..)

Part number, or reference designator?
The question is now: is there drawn to much current from this zener/7812
circuit or is it normal(bad bad design!). Who knows?

You could tack in a low value resistor in front of the zener and
measure it.

TM
 
A

Arfa Daily

Tim Schwartz said:
Peter (and others who have replied),

Unfortunately, some of these diodes do run hot. D716 is also doing the
same thing as D718 in the T762 for a different 12V regulator, so I'd see
how hot that diode (D716) is getting. Of course if the current load is
different on the regulator, the temperature may be different as well. I
don't have a T762 here to look at right now.

I would certainly agree with the other poster that the input capacitor
coming off the bridge rectifier (C704, 3300uf/35V) could be in trouble and
high ripple could cause problems. This can easily be scoped by looking at
the cathode end of either D718 or D716.

I have had problems on this series of NAD's with the bridge rectifier
diodes D701-704, especially if there is the brownish glue on them. They
often have horrible solder joints, and sometimes fail. I replace them
(originally they are 1N4004)with 1N5399 diodes which are rated for 1.5
amps. I also stand them off the board a bit for better cooling. If you
are running with only 3 of these diodes connected, you'll certainly have
higher ripple on the cap.

While you have the board out (lucky you) I'd also check D705-708 in the
same area and maybe replace them as well. Also check soldering in general
of the regulators. You don't want to have to keep removing the board as
it is rather time consuming and annoying.

Many owner's don't realize that surround sound receivers in general run
quite hot inside and need good air flow around them. I suggest at least 3
inches (8cm) of open air above the receiver if on an open shelf, and a
couple of inches (5cm) on either side and rear. The receiver should also
be on a hard surface, not carpet or such.

To other repliers: These supplies that we are discussing are low voltage
regulators for the input switching, digital board and front panel, just
about everything EXCEPT the power amps.

Regards,
Tim Schwartz
Bristol Electronics

So how much current do you reckon is being drawn off that rail Tim ? If all
the logic and opamps and whatever are being fed from it, you'd have to
reckon on at least the 330mA that would take the dissipation in that zener
up to 1.6 watts or so. 400mA and we're at its limit. Obviously, you see a
lot of these. Is it common for that zener to fail ? I don't remember ever
having had one, but then if they fail short, I've maybe never had cause to
go looking ?? Seems like a piece of design work of marginal validity to me.
Does it reduce the temperature of the regulator by much ? Is it worth it for
the dissipation created in the zener, and the apparent reliability issues
which ensue ? As one service engineer to another, I would be interested in
your opinions.

Arfa
 
E

Eeyore

Arfa said:
Wot, Jamie or me Graham ?? :)

Jamie.

I've never once seen a post where he 'gets it'. It never stops him pontificating
though. I understand he's a programmer. Explains a lot.

Graham
 
F

Franc Zabkar

Peter (and others who have replied),

Unfortunately, some of these diodes do run hot. D716 is also doing the
same thing as D718 in the T762 for a different 12V regulator, so I'd see
how hot that diode (D716) is getting. Of course if the current load is
different on the regulator, the temperature may be different as well. I
don't have a T762 here to look at right now.

Why not replace the single 5V1 zener with two series 2V7 zeners? Or
add a resistor in parallel with the zener?

- Franc Zabkar
 
J

Jamie

Eeyore said:
Arfa Daily wrote:




The guy is totally clueless about hardware design.

Graham
Get a life asshole.

I most likely knew 10 times your current knowledge before I turned
the age of 18 and left home, where I took up work designing circuits
that you could have used once your self at one time or another.

Worked with an engineering group that placed many of my designs into
production of various things. That was the good old days, the
chinese market killed..

I now work mostly doing industrial designs, upgrades, special
OEM Uc boards etc. Also did some free lance work with Semco
" A capacitor manufacture" designing new automative equipment
in assembling mica chip capacitors using robotics assemblers
that was all done in computer software.

I don't why i'm wasting my time telling you this, it's so far
beyond you it isn't funny.

I've watched you here foaming at the mouth. You must be one the
most arrogant British trash I have ever seen..


Take about some one clue less. You fit the bill.

btw, any more of your solders making mistakes over there and
trying to past the buck along to us?. It seems to be a traditional
past time! if you're an example.
 
A

Arfa Daily

Jamie said:
Get a life asshole.

I most likely knew 10 times your current knowledge before I turned the
age of 18 and left home, where I took up work designing circuits that you
could have used once your self at one time or another.

Worked with an engineering group that placed many of my designs into
production of various things. That was the good old days, the
chinese market killed..

I now work mostly doing industrial designs, upgrades, special
OEM Uc boards etc. Also did some free lance work with Semco
" A capacitor manufacture" designing new automative equipment
in assembling mica chip capacitors using robotics assemblers
that was all done in computer software.

I don't why i'm wasting my time telling you this, it's so far
beyond you it isn't funny.

I've watched you here foaming at the mouth. You must be one the
most arrogant British trash I have ever seen..


Take about some one clue less. You fit the bill.

btw, any more of your solders making mistakes over there and
trying to past the buck along to us?. It seems to be a traditional
past time! if you're an example.

Don't start down that path, pal. I object to the British being collectively
described by you as "trash". No one has made any comments about you as "An
American" . And what are you talking about regarding solder and "passing the
buck" along to you ? Lets just try and all get along without starting
another pissing contest, shall we ?

Graham. Leave Jamie alone, and Jamie, stop your name calling.
 
J

Jamie

Eeyore said:
Arfa Daily wrote:




Jamie.

I've never once seen a post where he 'gets it'. It never stops him pontificating
though. I understand he's a programmer. Explains a lot.

Graham
Graham, You better go back to the shitter and wipe your ass. Something
smells and I know it isn't me.

If only you had a clue, oh wet, you stopped at the birth of
cat whisker diodes and germanium transistors. I understand, to
complicated. Stay with your valves, they suit you fine.

I must say, your so far out of league you make me laugh. That is
the only reason I respond.

Btw, A couple of my engineer friends monitor this area, they think
you're a real peach.
 
J

Jamie

Arfa said:
Don't start down that path, pal. I object to the British being collectively
described by you as "trash". No one has made any comments about you as "An
American" . And what are you talking about regarding solder and "passing the
buck" along to you ? Lets just try and all get along without starting
another pissing contest, shall we ?

Graham. Leave Jamie alone, and Jamie, stop your name calling.
Oh, should I direct you to post after post of Graham bashing the US?
and everything it stands for?

Until you know who and what Graham is, I'd suggest you sit back and
monitor a bit.
That comment was directed to him not the British as a whole. I feel
sorry for the british that they have people like him they must deal with.
And I feel sorry for you, because he just sucked you into it..
I'm sure he's sitting back now and enjoying this while he's sucking
on his crumpets and tea.

If you don't want to heed my warnings about him so be it, Every one
has a right to make there own choices. To bad Graham doesn't know what
i'm talking about.
 
E

Eeyore

Jamie said:
Graham, You better go back to the shitter and wipe your ass. Something
smells and I know it isn't me.

If only you had a clue, oh wet, you stopped at the birth of
cat whisker diodes and germanium transistors. I understand, to
complicated. Stay with your valves, they suit you fine.

I must say, your so far out of league you make me laugh. That is
the only reason I respond.

Btw, A couple of my engineer friends monitor this area, they think
you're a real peach.

They're as thick as you are ?

Your 'theories' above were totally pathetic btw.

Graham
 
Top