J
Jamie M
Hi,
I read about a modification to the uncertainty principle that takes
into account "recoil" in the measurement device, so that more
information about the system is actually available than the uncertainty
principle would predict:
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v8/n3/abs/nphys2194.html
Here is another article that verified the measurement device recoil
impact on measurement uncertainty from above:
http://phys.org/news/2012-10-certainty-uncertainty-quantum-mechanical-role.html
So if the measurement device inertia is very small then it will have
more recoil so more information can be extracted? Also doesn't this
imply that entanglement is incorrect?
cheers,
Jamie
I read about a modification to the uncertainty principle that takes
into account "recoil" in the measurement device, so that more
information about the system is actually available than the uncertainty
principle would predict:
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v8/n3/abs/nphys2194.html
Here is another article that verified the measurement device recoil
impact on measurement uncertainty from above:
http://phys.org/news/2012-10-certainty-uncertainty-quantum-mechanical-role.html
So if the measurement device inertia is very small then it will have
more recoil so more information can be extracted? Also doesn't this
imply that entanglement is incorrect?
cheers,
Jamie