The Problem With Faking A Tech Background

[DanB (Previously DB)]

He doesn't have a problem. He is doing what he does. Much like Rod
Speed, he finds plenty of victims that will retort to his crap.

He is the perfect example of a successful troll.

He 'is' a problem for usenet and the 'problem' is easily cured by
ignoring his posts.

I haven't been here, (sci.energy), in a while. It is a shame that it has
become a wasteland of stupidity. Years ago, there was some serious
discovery going on by many participants. No more it seems...

 

[[email protected]]

Cahill's problem...

He doesn't have a problem.

I have AGW, ground transportation and a host of censorship problems.
I have a full plate.

He is doing what he does.

Which is to start threads on possible _solutions_ to problems.

Much like Rod
Speed, he finds plenty of victims that will retort to his crap.

I've been telling the dunces here that if they don't want to make
themselves look stupid, then they need to stay off my threads.

He is the perfect example of a successful troll.

So was Socrates. Flattery will get you nowhere.

He 'is' a problem for usenet and the 'problem' is easily cured by
ignoring his posts.

BINGO! This guy has figgered it out. The dunces need to stay off my
threads.


Bret Cahill

 

[[email protected]]

Cahill's problem is that he fancies himself an "idea man" par excellence

One of these days someone will tire of him, and turn their lawyers
loose.

Truth is always a defense which is precisely why only a delusional
would ever sue me for libel.

Now, if one of you is far enough out of touch with reality then you
actually might find some shyster to sue.

This actually happened once. I wasted an _entire_ morning working on
the case. I requested production of documents and that afternoon, on
a hunch, I drove buy the U. S. 301 - I-4 business park and they were
loading all their stuff in a van.

I'm a firm believer in being helpful to opposing counsel so I called
their shyster law firm, Robbins, Gaynor, Bronstein, et. al.:

"Look, I'm Bret Cahill, the defendant in the Universal case. I was
just down at bankruptcy court and I noticed you claimed you lost
$5,000 in your client's Chapt. 7 filing.

"First of all, I don't think you did $5K worth of work, maybe it was
more like $85.56.

"Also, if you had asked me, I would have told you Terry Ottinger was a
scamer."

After that, he won't be a problem.

There's no problem now unless someone is charging money for a scam
"electronics training course."

Sham "training courses" flourish during recessions. Desperate people
out of work make easy prey for an organized fraud scheme.

It's either a first or second degree felony, I can't remember.

I will help the authorities prosecute to the full extent of the law if
I get wind of such a scam.

Anyone here know of anyone charging our sci.electronins.basics dunces
money for "electronics training?"

If his ideas were any good,
he would be in a think tank for a government agency

It's the duty of _every_ engineer to be a think tank for every
government agency.


Bret Cahill

 

[[email protected]]

The dunce is vexed therefor I am right about him.
You are delusional.

Tell us more about that defamation case.

I'm telling everyone that you are incapable of doing anything more
than maybe installing cable TV yet you are too cowardly to defend your
"reputation."


Bret Cahill

 

[[email protected]]

JF has his own company,

And like vapor ware, it has no address.

No paper trail.

Nothing in the public record.

In other words, it's a fantasy like his money making patent.

I'd be more than happy to call him a fraud but not only does he not
have any happy customers.

He has no customers whatsoever.

Being delusional ain't against the law.


Bret Cahill

 

[[email protected]]

Cahill's problem is that he fancies himself an "idea man" par excellence
You really are stupid.

Look up the terms moron.

If it isn't, where do you think it comes from?

There's no need to do that since

Since you aren't even functional enough to be a fraud.

.. . . .

Ooops. I think I discovered why our dunce changed his mind about a
defamation suit:

No comment?


Bret Cahill

 

[[email protected]]

Cahill's problem...

He doesn't have a problem.

There's global warming, sustainable energy, censorship and last as
well as least, dunces trying to fake a tech nackground.

I have a full plate.

He is doing what he does.

Presenting solutions to problems.

Much like Rod
Speed, he finds plenty of victims that will retort to his crap.

I've been telling the dunces to stay off my threads too.

You think we'll be successful in getting their case workers to find
them other activities?

He is the perfect example of a successful troll.

Socrates was a troll. Flattery will get you nowhere.

He 'is' a problem for usenet and the 'problem' is easily cured by
ignoring his posts.

BINGO! This guy has figgered it out!

The dunces need to go to other threads because they just look stoopid
trying to fake a teck background on threads concerning thermo.


Bret Cahill

 

[[email protected]]

You obviously have no clue as to what losses are incurred in trying to

.. . .

I show my work and take the lumps when I make a mistake.

And the lumps you are taking now are for your mistake trying to fake a
tech background.


Bret Cahill

 

[Bret Cahill]

You obviously have no clue as to what losses are incurred in trying to

You really do have an unwarrantedly high opinion of yourself.

You certainly didn't hurt it any by wimping out of your defamation
suit. That just proves I'm telling the truth when I say you are a
fraud.

BTW, you know what happens when someone postures like he's going to
sue for defamation then he wimps out?

EVERYONE knows he's "a fraud."

ANYONE can call you a fraud now.

Anyway back to what's bothering you: Your low self esteem.

Your lack of "happy customers."

A great man -- a self proclaimed "listener" -- recently died. You
would benefit by forgetting about me and listening to his last
interview.

You are making the same mistake as the guys in the lobby of his mom's
hotel.


Bret Cahill


http://www.aarpmagazine.org/money/fear_economy_studs_terkel.html

The Great Depression. I was about 17 years old. Hoover was still
president. People had been living high off the hog. And then, boom,
comes the Crash. It was so sudden. Guys jumped out of windows. They
didn’t know what to do. The wise men ran around, and then they cried
out after Roosevelt for the government to help them out. Regulation.
They asked for it. They cried for it. The wise men were lost, just as
they are today. The free market fell on its fanny. We learned nothing.
It’s exactly the same today.

“The lessons of the Great Depression? Don’t blame yourself. Turn to
others. The big boys are not that bright.”

My mother ran a hotel, the Wells-Grand Hotel, for men, just outside
Chicago’s skid row.

Skilled workers. Mechanics. Guys with jobs here and there. Some
retired. It was fine. The lobby in the hotel was empty in the daytime.
It was just a little room, and at night they’d come play hearts and
pinochle. Then came 1929. Suddenly they’re not working. Or those guys
who retired, suddenly their pensions are gone. Now they’re in the
lobby in the daytime. They don’t know what the hell to do. So they
drank more. And played the horses more. And there were fights. What
were the fights over? Their own self-respect. I mean, they had nothing
to do. They were furious. Who do you blame? Who do you hit? You hit
each other. That was sort of a metaphor for what happened to the
country. They blamed themselves. Yet I met these people who weathered
it one way or the other, some just by lending a hand.


-- Studds Terkel

 

[Eeyore]

You obviously have no clue as to what losses are incurred in trying to
transfer power inductively through air and are trolling for someone to
do the legwork so you can pretend you did and that you know what you're
talking about.

Interestingly, you've hoisted yourself on your own petard since the
numbers are _all_ bad and you should have known that before you posted
your idiotic proposal.

Isn't it great when we agree ?

Graham