Hi all,
I'll kick off my registered usage here by proposing the following questions:
1) As far as I can discern from info out there, the ordered terminal assignments for a standard legacy 610 cream telephone socket for Australian "standard" domestic colours are as follows: Term. 1 - Term. 6 red, white, unused, unused, black, blue. The corresponding US Bell colours (some cables also found in Australia) are black, green, unused, unused, yellow, red. Several sources on the net agree with this, including a comprehensive Wikipedia article, which in this case seems authoritative. However in practice I have found some more recently manufactured cables differ in this colour order, such as (a) legacy black, white, unused, unused, red, blue - where the red and black wires are swapped.on the socket side. Or (b) on the plug side with Bell colours: black, red, unused, unused, yellow, green, where the green and red wires are swapped. I would like to know if these are wiring errors or serve a specific purpose. I don't think this has anything to do with straight through versus crossover cables, since only one of each pair is swapped in each case.
2) The 'relative' positive potential (although it's actually only about 0.2V DC relative to earth) from the exchange is found these days on the blue wire (Term. 6) and the negative potential of -54V on the white wire (Term. 2). This surprised me, as I expected Term.1 and Term 2 to both be Tip (positive) voltages and Term. 5 and 6 Ring (negative) voltages, and I thought this was the historical reality (all Tip voltages are relatively positive). In the anomalous version of (a) above, the blue wire is labelled as Ring in an article where I found this configuration, even though it's relatively positive! I can see some issues with having two terminals on the same plastic prong 'opposite' in charge. For example, if one sets up a Mode 3 domestic circuit, say in back the 70's with a Fax upstream from the phone on a 611 socket, then if one unplugged the Fax to service it, the 611 socket terminals 1&2 would contact each other and reverse the direction of the downstream current to the phones (from its normal sense if independently hooked up to a separate exchange line. Since phones may not be polarity sensitive, this may not matter, but it's just a matter of unnecessary disorder in a phone circuit.
I'll kick off my registered usage here by proposing the following questions:
1) As far as I can discern from info out there, the ordered terminal assignments for a standard legacy 610 cream telephone socket for Australian "standard" domestic colours are as follows: Term. 1 - Term. 6 red, white, unused, unused, black, blue. The corresponding US Bell colours (some cables also found in Australia) are black, green, unused, unused, yellow, red. Several sources on the net agree with this, including a comprehensive Wikipedia article, which in this case seems authoritative. However in practice I have found some more recently manufactured cables differ in this colour order, such as (a) legacy black, white, unused, unused, red, blue - where the red and black wires are swapped.on the socket side. Or (b) on the plug side with Bell colours: black, red, unused, unused, yellow, green, where the green and red wires are swapped. I would like to know if these are wiring errors or serve a specific purpose. I don't think this has anything to do with straight through versus crossover cables, since only one of each pair is swapped in each case.
2) The 'relative' positive potential (although it's actually only about 0.2V DC relative to earth) from the exchange is found these days on the blue wire (Term. 6) and the negative potential of -54V on the white wire (Term. 2). This surprised me, as I expected Term.1 and Term 2 to both be Tip (positive) voltages and Term. 5 and 6 Ring (negative) voltages, and I thought this was the historical reality (all Tip voltages are relatively positive). In the anomalous version of (a) above, the blue wire is labelled as Ring in an article where I found this configuration, even though it's relatively positive! I can see some issues with having two terminals on the same plastic prong 'opposite' in charge. For example, if one sets up a Mode 3 domestic circuit, say in back the 70's with a Fax upstream from the phone on a 611 socket, then if one unplugged the Fax to service it, the 611 socket terminals 1&2 would contact each other and reverse the direction of the downstream current to the phones (from its normal sense if independently hooked up to a separate exchange line. Since phones may not be polarity sensitive, this may not matter, but it's just a matter of unnecessary disorder in a phone circuit.