John Larkin wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
[...]
http://www.kexin.com.cn/pdf/KC846S.pdf
No useful specs.
That is normal with many Asian suppliers, got to get used to it and test
a lot for yourself. You can sometimes obtain additional data from them
but sometimes you'd have to be married to the CEO's cousin's daughter or
something like that.
"Test a lot?" What does that tell me? It went against my grain to use a
green LED (GaN) at 3.3V. "Because one works..." Well, at least if the next
lot doesn't work we'll know.
I didn't mean a lot as in production lot, but as in "a lot of testing"
Meaning some of the properties have to be measure. In some designs that
is the only way to succeed because there are no parts that can
"formally" do what you need them to do.
http://www.rohm.com/products/discrete/transistor/complex/#03
"Very small package with two transistors."
All those aren't fast though.
Me? I don't need fast. ;-)
Lucky you
Almost all my stuff is RF nowadays.
We buy modules for all that stuff. I wouldn't attempt it with the shoestring
capital budget we're on (we're down a scope and it doesn't appear that they're
going to even replace it).
A scope? That's scary. I hope that doesn't mean any bad news. You can
nowadays get a lotta scope for $1-2k.
Or a Rigol, for $350.
That may be bit skimpy. I often find myself debugging and finding things
on the digital side, where everyone was 110% sure it couldn't possibly
be a software issue. That's mostly SPI and other serial buses where 2ch
won't really work. Also, I found that 100MHz BW ain't enough. Glitches
in systems where a 8051 screams along at 80MHz or so are specterally
above that.
That's been my point when management (and the other engineer) suggest that
100MHz is enough. Gotta have at least 3X, 5x is better.