It behaves as if it's caused by the junction - for example, do you
have to compensate for the length of the leads? ;-)
Only if the impedance of your meter causes significant IR voltage drop
in the leads.
It may seem to be caused by the junction if you don't think about it
much, but when you try to understand why a junction could cause
thermocouple voltages there are no answers. What exactly is the
physical effect? How does the junction know what the temperature at
the other junction is? Where does the energy come from? In a 3-metal
junction, where the thermocouple leads are separately spot welded to
the part being monitored or where copper meter leads are attached, it
is known that the third metal in the junction has no effect on the
measurement - why is that?
Once you understand that it is the total temperature gradient between
junctions that causes the voltage, the thermocouple actually makes
sense. It is a heat engine which obeys all laws of thermodynamics;
the energy which produces the voltage is driven by the conduction of
heat energy from the hot end to the cold end. No temperature gradient
in the third metal of the 3-metal junction means no voltage
contribution.
When a temperature gradient exists in a metal most of the thermal
energy transport (heat conduction) is done by movement of free
electrons; higher energy electrons travel from the hot end to the cold
end and lower energy electrons travel at the same rate from the cold
end to the hot end. The higher energy electrons have a higher
electrical resistance associated with their current flow from hot to
cold than the lower energy electrons have associated with their
identical current flow from cold to hot; therefore (in the absense of
externally imposed current) the hot end is always more negative than
the cold end in metals (or semiconductors where electrons are the
majority carriers - opposite for holes). The magnitude of the effect
is different for different materials, and it varies with temperature
in a complex non-linear way which is different for different
materials, but no problem, the results for metal pairs that
thermocouples are made of have been tabulated for your convienience.
This has all been explained much better in the various references I
have posted links to over the years, and I think anyone with any
interest in thermocouples would benefit by reading them and/or
additional reading on the subject.
http://www.electronics-cooling.com/Resources/EC_Articles/JAN97/jan97_01.htm
I guess I just have a weakness for explanations that make physical
sense
.
Regards,
Glen