B
Bob Worthy
Mark Leuck said:Most phone booth's I see these days have no phones in em
Superman is a bit older now and needs the extra room as all you old farts
can probably relate too.
Mark Leuck said:Most phone booth's I see these days have no phones in em
Bob Worthy said:Superman is a bit older now and needs the extra room as all you old farts
can probably relate too.
Tantalust said:Good place to let one loose, too. (>L<)
- -
"If there are no dogs in heaven, then when I die, I want to go where they
went."
-Will Rogers
Doug said:--
From a dispute over phone charges to cutting the cheese in a phone both, is
it just me or has this thread lost its way somewhat ?
Doug
--
From a dispute over phone charges to cutting the cheese in a phone both, is
it just me or has this thread lost its way somewhat ?
Doug
Bob Worthy said:Doug said:--
From a dispute over phone charges to cutting the cheese in a phone both, is
it just me or has this thread lost its way somewhat ?
Doug
You mean sorta like the cold coffee and stale bagel in another thread? ]
Doug said:Bob Worthy said:both,Doug said:--
Superman is a bit older now and needs the extra room as all you old farts
can probably relate too.
Good place to let one loose, too. (>L<)
- -
"If there are no dogs in heaven, then when I die, I want to go where they
went."
-Will Rogers
From a dispute over phone charges to cutting the cheese in a phone
isit just me or has this thread lost its way somewhat ?
Doug
You mean sorta like the cold coffee and stale bagel in another thread? ]
No, I mean like the cold coffee & stale bagel in this thread
Doug
Doug said:--
From a dispute over phone charges to cutting the cheese in a phone both,
is it just me or has this thread lost its way somewhat ?
Doug
Tantalust said:From a dispute over phone charges to cutting the cheese in a phone both,
is it just me or has this thread lost its way somewhat ?
Doug
What are payphones? <
Now that said... at a rough guess I'd say the alarm company may have
changed their contact number and missed switching over a few panels,
since others seem to have had the same problem. I don't see what the
age of the modem would have to do with anything; the only possible issue
I could see is if the system is dialing a 7-digit number when the
monitoring station has changed area codes, but from the sound of it, it
IS dialing a different area code than you're in, and still, the number
should be controlled by the panel, not the modem.
Actually where I have run across this type of problem is when the customer
has added DSL service to their home or business phone line without bothering
to notify the alarm company. What usually happens is either the CS receiver
can't hear the signals over the DSL carrier OR more often the panel can't
hear the kissof signal from the CS so it sends the signal again.
Since all of my panels dial my toll free lines I just eat the toll cost when
it happens, and charge the customer for a DSL filter specific to alarm
panels.
NOW! Technically it is the customer's fault, or the DSL providers fault in
this case. I recently did a DSL self install in my house, and the
instruction clearly said that if you have an alarm panel notify your alarm
company. I have also had clients call me and tell me their self install
instructions for their new DSL modem said the same thing. If these
instruction are well enough known to be documented for self installers there
is absolutely no excuse for a proffessional DSL installer to make this
mistake either.
In this case we can't say who is at fault until we actually discover the
problem for this run-a-way repeat signal attempt, but addition of DSL to the
line can cause almost exactly these symptoms.
Of course we have over looked an underlying problem which could be makling
things worse. AT&T. If they have the customer on a carrier where they are
compressing to many phone lines over the available bandwidth they could be
distorting the signal enroute. Usually the kissof signal is the one that
suffers. Most of the time you can hear a little echo or tin can sound to
the lines on a voice call when this is the case, but not always. The fact
that the customer's panel is dialing the local ANI terminated line rather
than the alarm companies toll free line says that whatever the customer's
toll provider does is what the alarm panel has to deal with. Another reason
to own your own lines, and pick your own carrier that caters to alarm
companies, and have your own toll free lines. Then rarely is the alarm
panel subject to the substandard service of the customer's toll provider.
Yes it costs you a few ¢ per signal, but the level of service is better.
Why this is the case for this customer is unknown. Maybe they have been on
the same service for 50 years and have never had anything upgraded ever, and
now its coming back to bite them.
The alarm company claim that they have no responsibility to monitor
these timer tests, and according to them, if the timer tests failed,
it is clients' responsibility as the alarm panel's LED light will be
blinking or sound an alarm sound. However in our case even up to today
the alarm panel never sounded or the LED light (the CMD indicator)
never blinked. So according to industry standard, is the alarm company
responsible to monitor these weekly timer tests? Or is it the client's
responsibility?
Also if we are to file a complaint about this issue, to which
regulatory agency of the alarm industry should we write to?
It was working fine for 16 years until November 2007. On 12/27/07 for
example, the alarm system dialed the central station from 1:40pm until
10:18am the following morning of 12/28/07, with one call per minute.
Despite 21 hours, or 1260 called to the central station, the alarm
company did not receive this test signal until 10:15am on 12/28/07.
The alarm company claim that they have no responsibility to monitor
these timer tests, and according to them, if the timer tests failed,
it is clients' responsibility as the alarm panel's LED light will be
blinking or sound an alarm sound. However in our case even up to today
the alarm panel never sounded or the LED light (the CMD indicator)
never blinked. So according to industry standard, is the alarm company
responsible to monitor these weekly timer tests? Or is it the client's
responsibility?
Also if we are to file a complaint about this issue, to which
regulatory agency of the alarm industry should we write to?
poor quality of the video prevents them from being able to identify the
culprit that took the camera down, even when he stands in front of the
camera waves at the camera mockingly before he drags it down.
I'd post that
picture on a Disney site because it looks pretty Mickey Mouse to me. Which
is worse, to put up a junky installation like that or to be too stupid to
know your installation is pure crap and embarrass yourself by actually
posting it to your web site? Is this another company that has no business
being in the business.
As for this guy's complaint about the toll charges?
Toss in the fact that they used a toll number instead of an 800 number for
the central station phone number.
Then setting a residential test timer for
daytime testing?
Roland Moore said:I have a complaint. Who decided that was a good installation of an outdoor
camera? This is a joke, right? Am I seeing things or is the drip loop
actually above the camera? And why on earth would one post that picture to
a
web site for "Commercial Security Solutions" when that would be a very
poor
even for a residential installation? Is that really the best they have?
As for this guy's complaint about the toll charges?
Toss in the fact that they used a toll number instead of an 800 number for
the central station phone number. Then setting a residential test timer
for
daytime testing?
And let's be honest here folks, most modern central stations would have
had
caller ID for that many signals and put the account on run away. The on
call
tech would have been getting a page about every 15 minutes to take care of
the problem. This company doesn't deserve any benefit of the doubt in my
opinion. Pay this man NOW! These guys level of service for this account
was
way below substandard as I see it.
Doug said:You're seeing things, the drip loop is below the camera, its still
not a great installation in my opinion since I would prefer either
liquid tight flex or a mount that passes the cable through without
there being any exposed cable.
Putting the account on run away won't stop the panel making a toll
call to the CS, and since it wasn't calling a toll free number its
possible or even likely that the caller ID was blocked as many
residence's block caller ID, so what's the alarm company to do? block all
unidentified incoming calls from their receivers? Wasn't it
you that threw a strop when you claimed a CS stopped signals from one
of your accounts?
A timer test mid afternoon is probably not a good idea on a
residential account, and on the face of it the alarm company should
have flagged a no timer test if the customer contracted for a weekly
timer test, but since it eventually came in it may have just flagged
it as late. I'd be disappointed if it was one of my accounts and we
didn't flag it but we really don't know the circumstances.
Who knows what caused the problem, the customer may have added
something to their phone service such as DSL, the alarm panel may
have simply developed a fault or the CS may have done something to
cause the problem.
Doug
alarman said:threw a strop?