D
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
Eeyore said:I agree about the visual adaptation, but the sensory quality at low lux falls
off markedly, not least requiring significant adaption time, the use of red
goggles etc.
In practical everyday use, I reckon our audible skills are the ones that
routinely return the widest dynamic range though. I certainly rate mine
anyway.![]()
You're not comparing like for like.
Visual acuity is seeing a pattern.
The audio equivalent would be making out a spoken word.
I suspect the ear would be vastly less sensitive if that were the criterion.