On 12 Sep 2006 11:37:57 -0700,
[email protected] wrote:
Possibly in a bad sit, GI. We did not arm you and train you so you
could threaten us, and we will not tolerate such behavior. If my
watchdog threatens my neighbor I will destroy the dog forthwith.
Friendly guidance and counsel: pick out what you can use from
responses you get, ignore what you can't use and STFU.
And yes, I'd get them on your ass in a minute. That's what they're
there for, isn't it, to keep bullies like you at bay?
No, John. Contrary to popular opinion and the logos on their cars,
police do not protect and serve. Police don't do anything other than
patrol and occasionally direct traffic until a crime has been
committed. However, the Army is another story. It exists to protect
and serve America and Americans. Americans must not and will not
tolerate threats from the very forces we arm and train. No member of
the armed forces may claim that he or she was "merely acting as an
individual" in a particular situation. Whether or not in uniform in a
particular instance, they are always subject to UCMJ (uniform code of
military justice). The U.S. Army does not condone bad behavior.
CG's (commanding generals) do not tolerate embarrassment by those in
their command, and those subject to UCMJ have NO civil rights. If a
soldier commits a civil crime, he will be dealt with under UCMJ. Even
if he didn't commit a civil crime, if he becomes a discredit to his
unit and command he will find himself reassigned to scut duty in some
armpit of the world very shortly thereafter.
The place to lodge your complaint would be with the CG of Fort Bragg,
letters also to congressmen. CG's don't appreciate negative attention
from congressmen one bit, not at all. Lots of shit gets overlooked in
a TO (theater of operations) but CG's in CONUS have zero tolerance
for such irritations. It would be dealt with decisively and
effectively.