S
Stuart Wallace
Hi all,
It's been a while since I've posted; I hope that someone can help with a
problem that I'm having. I apologise for the length of this posting;
I've tried to be as complete as possible in my descriptions.
I'm trying to make PCBs at the moment. I'm having a problem using
"POSITIV 20" spray photo-resist.
Here's my process:
1. Brush a piece of single-sided copper-clad board with a Scotchbrite
pad to get a decent shiny surface, then wipe off the accumulated copper
dust.
2. Clean the board with a degreasing substance (Autoglym engine
degreaser) three times.
3. Clean the board with an alcohol-based cleaner three times.
4. Shake the can of photo-resist well, then spray side-to-side across
the board as evenly as possible from a distance of about 20cm. I do this
under reduced light.
5. Place the board in an opaque container, sit the lid on the container
such that light is blocked but fumes can escape, and leave at room temp
(ranges from 15-25 deg C in the UK at the moment) in a pretty dark room
for 24 hours.
6. UV-expose the board. My exposure unit is a gutted flat-bed scanner
containing two 8W UV tubes mounted about 5cm below the glass. The inside
of the scanner case is lined with reflective foil. The artwork is a load
of test patterns that I drew on a transparent OHP sheet (acetate) using
a solvent-based black permanent marker.
7. Develop the board in a solution of sodium metasilicate made up
according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
My problem is that after developing, I either end up with "tracks" so
faint that they can be rubbed off by hand, or the board barely develops
at all. I have varied the UV exposure time from 1 minute to 15 minutes
in 1-minute increments, and I am unable to get anything approaching a
satisfactory result.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Some people seem to swear by spray
photo-resist; others think it's worthless. Also, how much resist should
I apply? So far I've been using the minimum necessary to coat the board.
Should I load more on there?
I'd be grateful for any help with this problem -- it's been driving me mad!
Thanks,
Stuart Wallace.
It's been a while since I've posted; I hope that someone can help with a
problem that I'm having. I apologise for the length of this posting;
I've tried to be as complete as possible in my descriptions.
I'm trying to make PCBs at the moment. I'm having a problem using
"POSITIV 20" spray photo-resist.
Here's my process:
1. Brush a piece of single-sided copper-clad board with a Scotchbrite
pad to get a decent shiny surface, then wipe off the accumulated copper
dust.
2. Clean the board with a degreasing substance (Autoglym engine
degreaser) three times.
3. Clean the board with an alcohol-based cleaner three times.
4. Shake the can of photo-resist well, then spray side-to-side across
the board as evenly as possible from a distance of about 20cm. I do this
under reduced light.
5. Place the board in an opaque container, sit the lid on the container
such that light is blocked but fumes can escape, and leave at room temp
(ranges from 15-25 deg C in the UK at the moment) in a pretty dark room
for 24 hours.
6. UV-expose the board. My exposure unit is a gutted flat-bed scanner
containing two 8W UV tubes mounted about 5cm below the glass. The inside
of the scanner case is lined with reflective foil. The artwork is a load
of test patterns that I drew on a transparent OHP sheet (acetate) using
a solvent-based black permanent marker.
7. Develop the board in a solution of sodium metasilicate made up
according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
My problem is that after developing, I either end up with "tracks" so
faint that they can be rubbed off by hand, or the board barely develops
at all. I have varied the UV exposure time from 1 minute to 15 minutes
in 1-minute increments, and I am unable to get anything approaching a
satisfactory result.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Some people seem to swear by spray
photo-resist; others think it's worthless. Also, how much resist should
I apply? So far I've been using the minimum necessary to coat the board.
Should I load more on there?
I'd be grateful for any help with this problem -- it's been driving me mad!
Thanks,
Stuart Wallace.