J
JosephKK
ChairmanOfTheBored [email protected] posted to
sci.electronics.design:
Thanks for enumerating _some_ of the variations on optical sword fluid
level sensors. There are more, including fiber optic bundles of
various kinds. How many more can you find? I remember a few more.
sci.electronics.design:
ChairmanOfTheBored [email protected] posted to
sci.electronics.design:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:22:34 GMT, Jan Panteltje
Fuel sensors, and fuel sensor wires, and control boxes...
They have been having problems for many years.
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts114/050716ecographic/
I just wonder what can be so difficult?
Cryogenics has its own set of anomalous behavior for electronics
immersed in extremely cold baths. Then, there's that "gas tight"
thing to keep things like explosions from being caused by such
sensors or the wires that feed and or exit them.
Maybe they should just put a big sight glass down the side of
the tank
and view it externally! :-]
Cryogenic temperatures. Think about it some more.
Two inches of glass by two inches wide by however many feet long,
expansion mounted with Conap polyurethane epoxy.
YOU think about it some more. Hell, we grow quarts now that is
very
pure. Wouldn't be that hard to grow a bar of that long enough.
Or even a large, round glass rod where the exposed line of sight
is
only about 5 degrees or so of the rod circumference, and the rest is
in
the tank. You could even grind notches in the inner side of it to
cause notable refractions between the liquid and rod as it passed
over the
notches. "Notches... we need stinking notches!" :-]
The "exposed "part would "see" very little "thermal attack" or
expansion
issues in such a case.
Thanks for enumerating _some_ of the variations on optical sword fluid
level sensors. There are more, including fiber optic bundles of
various kinds. How many more can you find? I remember a few more.