Maker Pro
Maker Pro

MPS U56 BJT Replacement Comparison and Options

I'm trying to find a proper replacement for an MPS U56 transistor and I'm starting to feel a little lost trying to decipher apples and oranges. First, this is from the power amplifier section of an HH Scott receiver. It goes right before the main output transistors. I've been comparing datasheets, and I believe that a 2SA1859 should do the trick, but when I start looking at things like the gain, they seem like apples and oranges because of how they bench tested them or something..

MPS U56: hFE=80 (IC=500mA, VCE=1V)
2SA1859: hFE=60-240 (IC=700mA, VCE=10V)

Am I barking up the wrong tree? Is there a better, more straight forward, replacement? Or are these similar enough that electrically everything is good and I'll never hear a difference?

Datasheets included.
 

Attachments

  • mpsu55_mpsu56.pdf
    99.7 KB · Views: 23
  • 2sa1859_ds_en.pdf
    28 KB · Views: 22

Harald Kapp

Moderator
Moderator
hfe should not be an issue. The MPS is spec'd crudely with hfe = 80 - 160 - ??? (min - typ - max) whereas the 2SA is spec'd with hfe = 75 - 150 - 220 (you'll have to check the hfe vs. Ic characteristics for these values).

hfe for any (bipolar) transistor always varies widely and the circuit design has to account for this e.g. by applying appropriate feedback mechanisms.
You'll have to care of the different case sizes and note the different order of Base, Emitter and Collector on the pins!
 
hfe for any (bipolar) transistor always varies widely and the circuit design has to account for this e.g. by applying appropriate feedback mechanisms.
You'll have to care of the different case sizes and note the different order of Base, Emitter and Collector on the pins!

Oh... that darn pinout... Thanks for mentioning that or I probably would've overlooked it entirely.

hfe for any (bipolar) transistor always varies widely and the circuit design has to account for this e.g. by applying appropriate feedback mechanisms.

Are these feedback mechanisms variable or is this something that I'm going to need to modify to keep the circuit stable?

Aside from the pinout being different, is there anything that jumps out that would make this a bad replacement choice?
 

Harald Kapp

Moderator
Moderator
Are these feedback mechanisms variable or is this something that I'm going to need to modify to keep the circuit stable?
They could be adjustable, but that is less common as adjusting an amplifier will cost time and money in production so a circuit that doesn't need adjustment is mostly preferred.

is there anything that jumps out that would make this a bad replacement choice?
You'll have to see for a good mechanical fit, especially the mounting to the heat sink may need some tinkering as the cases are different.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info, Edd, O Captain, my Captain! It seems I was looking for cross reference information in all the wrong places as it kept pulling up an 'all purpose' NTE transistor during my previous searches.

As for the model number, I suppose I didn't think it was pertinent.. However, ask and ye shall receiver!

We have here a dusty HH Scott Stereomaster 636! It comes complete with a half-dead rectifier circuit (patched for testing purposes), a burnt out power fuse (replaced), a 14A speaker fuse (replaced with proper fuse), a 2SD201 output transistor that tests as two diodes (pulled), and a driver transistor that tests as two diodes (the infamous MPS U56).

I did pull the other 2SD01's and the matching MPS U06 for proper testing and they're good, but I'm probably gonna have to replace them all anyhow
 

Attachments

  • 20180831_120644.jpg
    20180831_120644.jpg
    207 KB · Views: 13
  • 20180831_120652.jpg
    20180831_120652.jpg
    209.4 KB · Views: 25
Top