J
-
Categories
-
Platforms
-
Content
Oh heavens let's hope not.
At least there's been no hurricane to knock out power and
communications first, and the waters (that I saw) were awful, but not
20 feet deep. Let's hope everything works out for our British
friends.
The comments to the above link were interesting. Here's another
(link):
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2127599.ece
John Larkin said:
Well, it's another case where everybody knew for years that it would
storm/rain, and the proper preparations were not made,
and the costs
will be extreme. Makes you want to re-read The Nine Tailors, where the
same situation was remarked on.
The necessary money was spent elsewhere.
I can't read a restaurant review these days without Global Warming
being lamented.
"It is tempting to blame the appalling weather on climate change,
which is believed to increase the chances of extreme rainfall events.
But one wet summer on its own proves very little. In fact, the top ten
wettest Julys all happened two or three centuries ago."
John said:
James said:Oh heavens let's hope not.
At least there's been no hurricane to knock out power and
communications first, and the waters (that I saw) were awful, but not
20 feet deep. Let's hope everything works out for our British
friends.
The comments to the above link were interesting. Here's another
(link):
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article2127599.ece
Well, it's another case where everybody knew for years that it would
storm/rain, and the proper preparations were not made, and the costs
will be extreme. Makes you want to re-read The Nine Tailors, where the
same situation was remarked on.
The necessary money was spent elsewhere.
I can't read a restaurant review these days without Global Warming
being lamented.
"It is tempting to blame the appalling weather on climate change,
which is believed to increase the chances of extreme rainfall events.
But one wet summer on its own proves very little. In fact, the top ten
wettest Julys all happened two or three centuries ago."
John
James Arthur said:Sorry to hear it! One tip: your food will keep a couple days if you
*don't* open your freezer. After that, open it up and start the bar-b-
que.
Actually it looks like they managed to save the regional power
distribution station, so hopefully we will keep power (500k people
were at risk of no power for 2+ weeks). But water supply has now
failed unfortunately, the regional water works is at the "epicenter"
so was flooded early on.
There are queues for water, helicopter rescues - it did remind me of
the Katrina coverage. But no loss of life AFAIK.
Tornado roared thru, left my house standing except for fence damage,
but several people's roofs in my pool :-(
Then it rained for three days. Left us as an island. They flew water
and food, baby diapers, etc., into Cocopah Elementary School (a block
away) in helicopters.
...Jim Thompson
DaveC said:I remember that. I was in Tucson in college then. We got wet, but nothing
like the Phoenix area...
Probably seems odd, to non-desert rats, that in the middle of the desert you
can drown.
I can't read a restaurant review these days without Global Warming
being lamented.
"It is tempting to blame the appalling weather on climate change,
which is believed to increase the chances of extreme rainfall events.
But one wet summer on its own proves very little. In fact, the top ten
wettest Julys all happened two or three centuries ago."
I have yet to read the links in this thread, but I have a couple
comments already:
1. The severe rainstorm was probably caused by a an unusual random
variation in weather conditions that occured mainly or entirely for
reasons other than global warming. There is some chance that due
to "butterfly effect" man-made causes caused such a bad rainstorm
to occur when it did as opposed to days or years earlier or later, though
such bad rainstorms are expected to occur every several decades even
without human interference. Weather history has a big track record of
things occaisionally going whacko.
2. Point 1 does not negate the existence of global warming and its
few negative consequences that it is actually causing already and the
greater negative causes that it will probably cause a few to several
decades from now.
- Don Klipstein ([email protected])
I have yet to read the links in this thread, but I have a couple
comments already:
1. The severe rainstorm was probably caused by a an unusual random
variation in weather conditions that occured mainly or entirely for
reasons other than global warming. There is some chance that due
to "butterfly effect" man-made causes caused such a bad rainstorm
to occur when it did as opposed to days or years earlier or later, though
such bad rainstorms are expected to occur every several decades even
without human interference. Weather history has a big track record of
things occaisionally going whacko.
2. Point 1 does not negate the existence of global warming and its
few negative consequences that it is actually causing already and the
greater negative causes that it will probably cause a few to several
decades from now.
The readers' comments suggest it might be worse--several remark on
increased runoff due to extensive urbanization, and siting
developments on flood plains. I.e., not just inaction, but actively
man-made.
LA Times style, that's paragraph 14. Paragraphs 1 though 13 as much
as say that greenhouses gasses converge over the UK to make it rain on
London.
What suprised me were the skeptical comments left by readers of both
articles. In the USA those people would be shouted down and ridiculed
as 'denyers.'
I remember that. I was in Tucson in college then. We got wet, but nothing
like the Phoenix area...
Probably seems odd, to non-desert rats, that in the middle of the desert you
can drown.
I remember camping in the desert way north of Phoenix. Bone dry,
blistering sun, not a whiff of a cloud anywhere. A ranger came by and
told us to get out of there, and pronto. There would be water roaring
through here in a few hours, he said.