J
jasen
Skywise wrote:
This guy is the same fellow that was pushing the idea
of a 12" optical disc for psychadelic virtual reality
with a 1hz sampling rate, a 1e12 bit resolution, and
1e12 by 1e12 by 1e12 pixel display.
No, you are wrong. The sample rate should *not* be 1 hz. The bit-rate
should be 1 bit per second. The sample rate should 1/[bit-resolution
(number of pixels)] hz
what a waste of time.
How so?
The refresh rate for that thing would exceed the lifetime of any viewer.
10^36 (or 1e36 if you want to write it that way) seconds is a long time.
and how do you propose to construct hardware that can last long enough to
display the first image?
Bye.
Jasen