P
petrus bitbyter
"Bill Bowden" <[email protected]> schreef in bericht
| I don't think I can notice a 30% change in light intensity. The eyes
| are sort of logarithmic aren't they? Maybe 2X to notice anything?
| There's a legend that controlling a LED with very short pulses
| increase the perceived brightness, thus saving power.
|
|Any truth to that?
|
|-Bill
|
I don't know about the eyes exactly but the light yield of a LED is not
proportional to the current through it. There is some optimum between light
yield and life time. A, let's say 10%, rise of the current above the normal
operating current will provide only little more light - though your eyes
will register the difference - but will shorten the LEDs lifetime
considerable. So for serious design you'll need to know the manufacturer and
obtain the datasheet for the LED you want to use.
If you want to dim a LED, PWM is told to do a better job then linear current
control. More light for the same average (and effective) current and better
control.
petrus bitbyter
|"Bill Bowden" <[email protected]> schreef in
berichtIt's a current regulator circuit. Here's a brief explanation:
R3 (33 ohms in the circuit) sets the current that will go through
the LED, regardless (within reason) of the voltage source.R2 applies + to the base of Q1 making Q1 conduct and allowing the LED
to draw current through R3 and Q1.When the current through R3 causes a voltage drop across R3 that equals
about .6 to .7 volts, Q2 conducts and creates a voltage drop across R2,
lowering the drive to the base of Q1, which in turn limits the amount
of current Q1 can conduct.Since we know R3 is 33 ohms, and that Vbe for Q2 is around .6 to .7
volts, we can figure the amount of current that will be allowed by
using ohms law: I = E/R so I = .7/33 or about 21 mA. If we figure
based on .6 volts, I = .6/33 or about 18 mAProvided we supply the circuit with a reasonable voltage, the current
through R3 (and therefore the LED) will be constant.
Reasonable in this case means a minimum voltage high enough to light
the LED in the circuit, and a maximum voltage low enough so that
the transistors maximum rating is not exceeded. Your 12 volt supply
is fine.As to substituting parts: for a typical LED, you can use any NPN
transistors you have on hand. The typical Vbe will be around .6 to .7
volts. There is nothing critical about R2 - it is chosen to keep Q2's
collector current well below maximum. R3 is not critical either, but
it is chosen so that the LED maximum current is not exceeded.Now, if you were to use a high power white LED, you need to select
components for that higher power - you can't just use whatever
you have on hand - and a heat sink for Q1 may be needed.There is an even simpler circuit using an LM317 regulator IC:-----
+12 -----in|LM317|out---+
----- |
adj [R]
| |
+---------+
|
[LED]
|
Gnd --------------------+The value for resistor R is computed by the formula R = 1.25/I
where I is the current you want the LED to draw. Say you use a
typical LED and you want the current through it to be set about
20 mA. A 62.5 ohm resistor would provide that, and a standard
value of 62 ohms, or 56 ohms or 68 ohms would be close enough,
yielding currents of ~ 20.16, 22.32 and 18.38 mA, respectively.You can also use the LM317 or the two transistor circuit with
LEDs in series.
| The problem with that regulator is it doesn't do much for efficiency.
| You still waste the same power using the regulator or just a single
| resistor. If he uses a couple white LEDs in series at 3.5 volts and a
| 270 ohm resistor, he gets 18mA at 12 volts and 28 mA at 14.5 volts.
| Should be in spec for small 20000 mcd LEDs.
|
| -Bill
|
The advantage of the resistor only solution is it's symplicity. The
disadvantage is the current variation of a 30%, which will vary the light
yield accordingly.
Using the proposed current source you will have a constant current, so
constant light. You can at least use two LEDs in series for more light.
There is not much to earn on the power efficiency side. Even if you go
using
a switcher, you will need an extremely efficient one to compensate for the
power used by that switcher itself.
That picture will change however when ordinary 20-50mA LEDs do not produce
enough light and you need to use more powerfull LEDs that require >100mA.
But unless ones interested in the electronics, you'd better buy a 12V LED
(car)lamp with the electronics build in.
petrus bitbyter
| I don't think I can notice a 30% change in light intensity. The eyes
| are sort of logarithmic aren't they? Maybe 2X to notice anything?
| There's a legend that controlling a LED with very short pulses
| increase the perceived brightness, thus saving power.
|
|Any truth to that?
|
|-Bill
|
I don't know about the eyes exactly but the light yield of a LED is not
proportional to the current through it. There is some optimum between light
yield and life time. A, let's say 10%, rise of the current above the normal
operating current will provide only little more light - though your eyes
will register the difference - but will shorten the LEDs lifetime
considerable. So for serious design you'll need to know the manufacturer and
obtain the datasheet for the LED you want to use.
If you want to dim a LED, PWM is told to do a better job then linear current
control. More light for the same average (and effective) current and better
control.
petrus bitbyter